Please wait a minute...
 
国土资源遥感  2016, Vol. 28 Issue (2): 175-181    DOI: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2016.02.27
  技术应用 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
长江上游安宁河流域生态环境脆弱性遥感监测
邵秋芳1, 彭培好1, 黄洁2, 刘智2, 孙小飞1, 邵怀勇1
1. 成都理工大学旅游与城乡规划学院, 成都 610059;
2. 四川省地质调查院, 成都 610081
Monitoring eco-environmental vulnerability in Anning River Basin in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River using remote sensing techniques
SHAO Qiufang1, PENG Peihao1, HUANG Jie2, LIU Zhi2, SUN Xiaofei1, SHAO Huaiyong1
1. College of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
2. Sichuan Geologic Survey, Chengdu 610081, China
全文: PDF(1316 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

为了解安宁河流域生态环境脆弱性情况,以卫星遥感图像作为主要信息源,以人口密度、国内生产总值、土地利用、土壤类型、高程、坡度、气温、降水、植被指数作为评价指标,综合运用地理信息系统技术和投影寻踪算法,构建空间投影寻踪模型,进而对安宁河流域生态环境脆弱性进行评价。以分析结果为依据,将研究区生态环境脆弱性划分为5个等级,分别是重度脆弱、中度脆弱、轻度脆弱、微度脆弱和潜在脆弱。研究结果表明,研究区生态脆弱性整体上属中等脆弱等级。由于生态环境保护政策的实施和地区人民对于生态环境保护意识的提高,研究区2013年相对于1993年,生态环境总体有所改善。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
董保根
车森
解龙根
单国慧
何乔
关键词 Mode滤波器机载LiDAR遥感图像分类近邻    
Abstract

In this study, the authors used satellite remote sensing image as the primary source of information while collecting additional data, and selected some indicators as assessment indexes such as population density, gross domestic product (GDP), land use, soil type, elevation, slope, temperature, precipitation, and vegetation index. Eco-environment vulnerability of Anning River Basin was evaluated by using the space projection pursuit model built by GIS technology and the projection pursuit algorithm. According to analytical results, eco-environmental vulnerability degrees in the study area were divided into five grades, i.e., heavy, medium, light, slight and potential. Through analyzing the evaluation results of environmental vulnerability in 1993 and 2013, the ecological vulnerability of the study area was moderate vulnerability on the whole. Due to the enforcement of the national policy and the improvement of people's awareness of environmental protection, the overall ecological environment was improved from 1993 to 2013 in the study area.

Key wordsMode filter    airborne LiDAR    remote sensing image    classification    nearest neighbor
收稿日期: 2014-10-22      出版日期: 2016-04-14
:  TP79  
基金资助:

中国地质调查局国土资源大调查项目"四川省重点矿集区矿山开发遥感调查与监测"(编号: 1212011120019)、国家自然科学基金项目"区域矿产资源开发的生态地质环境安全过程分析和预警"(编号: 41302282)、教育部高等学校博士点基金项目"基于多时相遥感数据的矿业型城市生态安全评价与预警研究"(编号: 20115122120007)及四川省应用基础项目"攀西矿区资源环境承载力时空过程分析和预警"(编号: 2015JY0145)共同资助。

通讯作者: 彭培好(1963-),男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为生态效益监测与计量评价、生态环境评价、生态环境与全球变化。Email: peihaop@163.com。
作者简介: 邵秋芳(1989-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为区域生态环境评估与空间建模。Email: 963243272@qq.com。
引用本文:   
邵秋芳, 彭培好, 黄洁, 刘智, 孙小飞, 邵怀勇. 长江上游安宁河流域生态环境脆弱性遥感监测[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2016, 28(2): 175-181.
SHAO Qiufang, PENG Peihao, HUANG Jie, LIU Zhi, SUN Xiaofei, SHAO Huaiyong. Monitoring eco-environmental vulnerability in Anning River Basin in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River using remote sensing techniques. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2016, 28(2): 175-181.
链接本文:  
https://www.gtzyyg.com/CN/10.6046/gtzyyg.2016.02.27      或      https://www.gtzyyg.com/CN/Y2016/V28/I2/175

[1] 赵东升,吴绍洪.气候变化情景下中国自然生态系统脆弱性研究[J].地理学报,2013,68(5):602-610. Zhao D S,Wu S H.Responses of vulnerability for natural ecosystem to climate change in China[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2013,68(5):602-610.

[2] 吴炳方,李苗苗,颜长珍,等.生态环境典型治理区5年期遥感动态监测[J].遥感学报,2005,9(1):32-38. Wu B F,Li M M,Yan C Z,et al.Environment monitoring over 1997-2002 with remote sensing in 5 national environmental project sites[J].Journal of Remote Sensing,2005,9(1):32-38.

[3] 周乐群,孙长安,高改萍,等.长江三峡工程库区生态环境遥感动态监测[J].国土资源遥感,2005,17(1):49-52.doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2005.01.12. Zhou L Q,Sun C A,Gao G P,et al.The remote sensing ecological environment dynamic monitoring of the Three Gorges reservoir area[J].Remote Sensing for Land and Resources,2005,17(1):49-52.doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2005.01.12.

[4] 李滨勇,陈海滨,唐海萍.基于AHP和模糊综合评判法的北疆各地州生态脆弱性评价[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,46(2):197-201. Li B Y,Chen H B,Tang H P.Assessing ecological fragility with AHP and fuzzy integrated evaluation in autonomous prefectures of Northern Xinjiang[J].Journal of Beijing Normal University:Natural Science,2010,46(2):197-201.

[5] 杜培军,陈宇,谭琨.湿地景观格局与生态安全遥感监测分析——以江苏滨海湿地为例[J].国土资源遥感,2014,26(1):158-166,doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2014.01.27. Du P J,Chen Y,Tan K.Monitoring and analyzing wetland landscape pattern change and ecological security using remote sensing images:a case study of Jiangsu coastal wetland[J].Remote Sensing for Land and Resources,2014,26(1):158-166,doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2014.01.27.

[6] 付博,姜琦刚,任春颖,等.基于神经网络方法的湿地生态脆弱性评价[J].东北师大学报:自然科学版,2011,43(1):139-143. Fu B,Jiang Q G,Ren C Y,et al.Ecological vulnerability assessment of wetland based on neural network[J].Journal of Northeast Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2011,43(1):139-143.

[7] 徐广才,康慕谊,Metzger M,等.锡林郭勒盟生态脆弱性[J].生态学报,2012,32(5):1643-1653. Xu G C,Kang M Y,Metzger M,et al.Ecological vulnerability research for Xilingol League, Northern China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(5):1643-1653.

[8] 裴欢,房世峰,覃志豪,等.干旱区绿洲生态脆弱性评价方法及应用研究——以吐鲁番绿洲为例[J].武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2013,38(5):528-532. Pei H,Fang S F,Qin Z H,et al.Method and application of ecological environment vulnerability evaluation in arid oasis:A case study of Turpan Oasis,Xinjiang[J].Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,2013,38(5):528-532.

[9] Kia M B,Pirasteh S,Pradhan B,et al.An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS:Johor River Basin,Malaysia[J].Environment Earth Sciences,2012,67(1):251-264.

[10] 孙东琪,张京祥,朱传耿,等.中国生态环境质量变化态势及其空间分异分析[J].地理学报,2012,67(12):1599-1610. Sun D Q,Zhang J X,Zhu C G,et al.An assessment of China's ecological environment quality change and its spatial variation[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2012,67(12):1599-1610.

[11] 虞继进,陈雪玲,陈绍杰.基于遥感和PSR模型的城市景观生态安全评价——以福建省龙岩市为例[J].国土资源遥感,2013,25(1):143-149,doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2013.01.25. Yu J J,Chen X L,Chen S J.Urban landscape ecological security assessment based on remote sensing and PSR model:A case study in Longyan City,Fujian Province[J].Remote Sensing for Land and Resources,2013,25(1):143-149,doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2013.01.25.

[12] Akgun A,Klncal C,Pradhan B.Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir City(west Turkey)[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2012,184(9):5453-5470.

[13] 徐庆勇,黄玫,陆佩玲,等.基于RS与GIS的长江三角洲生态环境脆弱性综合评价[J].环境科学研究,2011,24(1):58-65. Xu Q Y,Huang M,Lu P L,et al.Integrated assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in Yangtze River Delta based on RS and GIS[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2011,24(1):58-65.

[14] Shao H Y,Liu M,Shao Q F,et al.Research on eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation of the Anning River Basin in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2014,72(5):1555-1568.

[15] Villa F,McLeod H.Environmental vulnerability indicators for environmental planning and decision-making:Guidelines and applications[J].Environmental Management,2002,29(3):335-348.

[16] Xu Q Y,Huang M,Lu P L,et al.Integrated assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in Yangtze River Delta based on RS and GIS[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2011,24(1):58-65.

[17] Bagdanavi?iūt? I,Valiūnas J.GIS-based land suitability analysis integrating multi-criteria evaluation for the allocation of potential pollution sources[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2013,68(6):1797-1812.

[18] Li A N,Wang A S,Liang S L,et al.Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in mountainous region using remote sensing and GIS:A case study in the upper reaches of Minjiang River,China[J].Ecological Modelling,2006,192(1/2):175-187.

[19] 徐庆勇,黄玫,刘洪升,等.基于RS和GIS的珠江三角洲生态环境脆弱性综合评价[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(11):2987-2995. Xu Q Y,Huang M,Liu H S,et al.Integrated assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in Pearl River Delta based on RS and GIS[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2011,22(11):2987-2995.

[20] Wang S Y,Liu J S,Yang C J.Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in the Yellow River Basin,China[J].Pedosphere,2008,18(2):171-182.

[21] 黄方,刘湘南,张养贞.GIS支持下的吉林省西部生态环境脆弱态势评价研究[J].地理科学,2003,23(1):95-100. Huang F,Liu X N,Zhang Y Z.GIS-based eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in west Jilin Province[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2003,23(1):95-100.

[22] 蔡海生,刘木生,陈美球,等.基于GIS的江西省生态环境脆弱性动态评价[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(5):190-196. Cai H S,Liu M S,Chen M Q,et al.Dynamic evaluation of ecological frangibility of Jiangxi Province based on GIS[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,29(5):190-196.

[1] 史飞飞, 高小红, 肖建设, 李宏达, 李润祥, 张昊. 基于集成学习和多时相遥感影像的枸杞种植区分类[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2022, 34(1): 115-126.
[2] 吴琳琳, 李晓燕, 毛德华, 王宗明. 基于遥感和多源地理数据的城市土地利用分类[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2022, 34(1): 127-134.
[3] 张大明, 张学勇, 李璐, 刘华勇. 一种超像素上Parzen窗密度估计的遥感图像分割方法[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2022, 34(1): 53-60.
[4] 李轶鲲, 杨洋, 杨树文, 王子浩. 耦合模糊C均值聚类和贝叶斯网络的遥感影像后验概率空间变化向量分析[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(4): 82-88.
[5] 李渊, 毋琳, 戚雯雯, 郭拯危, 李宁. 基于改进OGMRF-RC模型的SAR图像分类方法[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(4): 98-104.
[6] 范莹琳, 娄德波, 张长青, 魏英娟, 贾福东. 基于面向对象的铁尾矿信息提取技术研究——以迁西地区北京二号遥感影像为例[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(4): 153-161.
[7] 白俊龙, 王章琼, 闫海涛. K-means聚类引导的无人机遥感图像阈值分类方法[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(3): 114-120.
[8] 王镕, 赵红莉, 蒋云钟, 何毅, 段浩. 月尺度农作物提取中GF-1 WFV纹理特征的应用及分析[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(3): 72-79.
[9] 刘万军, 高健康, 曲海成, 姜文涛. 多尺度特征增强的遥感图像舰船目标检测[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(3): 97-106.
[10] 蒋校, 钟昶, 连铮, 吴亮廷, 邵治涛. 卫星遥感地质信息产品分类标准研究进展[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(3): 279-283.
[11] 韩彦岭, 崔鹏霞, 杨树瑚, 刘业锟, 王静, 张云. 基于残差网络特征融合的高光谱图像分类[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2021, 33(2): 11-19.
[12] 孟清, 白红英, 赵婷, 郭少壮, 齐贵增. 秦岭山地对气溶胶的生态屏障效应[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2021, 33(1): 240-248.
[13] 许赟, 许艾文. 基于随机森林的遥感影像云雪雾分类检测[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2021, 33(1): 96-101.
[14] 江珊, 王春, 宋宏利, 刘玉锋. 基于SAR与光学遥感数据相结合的农作物种植类型识别研究[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2020, 32(4): 105-110.
[15] 张莉, 谢亚楠, 屈辰阳, 汪鸣泉, 常征, 王茂华. 基于K-Means城市分类算法的夜光遥感电力消费估算[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2020, 32(4): 182-189.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-2
版权所有 © 2015 《自然资源遥感》编辑部
地址:北京学院路31号中国国土资源航空物探遥感中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060291/62060292 E-mail:zrzyyg@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发