Please wait a minute...
 
国土资源遥感  2020, Vol. 32 Issue (4): 219-226    DOI: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2020.04.27
  技术应用 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于景观生态风险的区域生态屏障建设研究
蒋蕾1(), 韩维峥1, 孙丽娜2
1.长春市规划编制研究中心(长春市城乡规划设计研究院),长春 130022
2.长春工程学院环境科学与工程系,长春 130022
A study on regional ecological barrier construction based on landscape ecological risk
JIANG Lei1(), HAN Weizheng1, SUN Lina2
1. Changchun Urban and Rural Planning and Design Institute, Changchun 130022, China
2. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130022, China
全文: PDF(3891 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

开展国土绿化行动、建设并筑牢生态安全屏障是我国建设生态文明的重要举措之一。当前,长春经济圈西北部地区生态问题相对较为突出,已成为区域生态安全的短板所在。以该区域为研究区,基于其生态本底特征和主要生态问题,构建了包含区域生态屏障因子的景观生态风险定量评价方法,研究结果表明: ①研究区生态屏障建设的关键区域包括景观生态风险相对较高地区和生态屏障建设相对薄弱地区2类; ②高风险区和较高风险区主要分布在农安县中部等地区,分别占研究区总面积的1.25%和1.74%; ③生态屏障建设相对薄弱地区是引入生态屏障因子后景观生态风险提高的区域,主要分布于长岭县与农安县交界地带,约占总面积的1/4。综合问题导向和目标导向,从加强景观生态风险管控、推进薄弱地区生态建设2方面分别提出了具有针对性的生态安全屏障建设策略,助推长春经济圈高质量、可持续发展。研究可为区域生态屏障建设研究和相关生态规划提供较为可行的思路,并为国土空间格局优化提供有益的参考。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
蒋蕾
韩维峥
孙丽娜
关键词 生态屏障景观生态风险评价生态安全国土空间格局优化长春经济圈    
Abstract

Carrying out territory virescence action and ecological barrier construction is one of the important measures of eco-civilization construction in China. At present, the ecological problems in the northwestern part of Changchun economic circle are relatively prominent, which have become the shortcoming of regional ecological security. Based on the ecological background characteristics and main ecological problems of the study area, the authors constructed a quantitative assessment method for landscape ecological risk including ecological barrier factor. The results are as follows: ① The key areas of ecological barrier construction in the study area include two categories: areas where landscape ecological risk is relatively high, and areas where ecological barrier construction is relatively weak; ② the areas with relatively high landscape ecological risk are mainly distributed in the central part of Nong’an County, accounting for 1.25% and 1.74% of the total area of the study area; ③ the relatively weak areas of ecological barrier construction are the areas where the landscape ecological risk increases after the introduction of ecological barrier factor, mainly distributed in the border zone between Changlin County and Nong’an County, accounting for about 1/4 of the total area. Based on the comprehensive problem-oriented and target-oriented approach, the authors put forward strategies from two aspects of strengthening the control of landscape ecological risk and promoting ecological construction in relatively weak areas, so as to promote the high-quality and sustainable development of Changchun economic circle. This study provides not only a feasible idea for the study of regional ecological barrier construction and related ecological planning but also a useful reference for the optimization of land space spatial pattern.

Key wordsecological barrier    landscape ecological risk assessment    ecological security    optimization of land space spatial pattern    Changchun economic circle
收稿日期: 2020-02-17      出版日期: 2020-12-23
:  TP79  
  X826  
作者简介: 蒋 蕾(1986-),女,硕士,环境保护工程师,主要从事生态和国土资源规划研究。Email:jianglei04012006@163.com
引用本文:   
蒋蕾, 韩维峥, 孙丽娜. 基于景观生态风险的区域生态屏障建设研究[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2020, 32(4): 219-226.
JIANG Lei, HAN Weizheng, SUN Lina. A study on regional ecological barrier construction based on landscape ecological risk. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2020, 32(4): 219-226.
链接本文:  
https://www.gtzyyg.com/CN/10.6046/gtzyyg.2020.04.27      或      https://www.gtzyyg.com/CN/Y2020/V32/I4/219
Fig.1  研究区位置
序号 遥感解译地类 景观生态类型
1 草地 草地
2 旱地、水田 耕地
3 采矿场、工业用地、交通用地、居住地 建设用地
4 森林 林地
5 河流、湖泊、沼泽、水库/坑塘、运河/水渠 湿地
6 裸土、沙漠/沙地、盐碱地 未利用地
Tab.1  研究区遥感解译地类与景观生态类型对照表
Fig.2  研究区景观生态类型及采样单元
Fig.3  方法流程
Fig.4  研究区景观格局指数的空间分布
Fig.5  研究区景观生态风险评价原始结果(分级)
Fig.6  研究区景观生态风险评价修正结果及相关指标的空间分布
Fig.7  研究区景观生态风险评价修正结果(分级)
序号 分级 生态风险评价
修正值范围
面积/km2 占研究区总
面积比例/%
1 低风险 [1.0,2.0) 2 497.6 21.03
2 较低风险 [2.0,9.0) 7 130.2 60.04
3 中等风险 [9.0,26.0) 1 892.3 15.94
4 较高风险 [26.0,68.0) 207.0 1.74
5 高风险 [68.0,169.8] 148.2 1.25
Tab.2  研究区景观生态风险评价修正结果的各分区面积
序号 差值 分区 面积/km2 占比/%
1 -4,-3 显著降低 1 022.61 8.61
2 -2,-1 略有降低 5 566.87 46.88
3 0 基本不变 2 299.33 19.36
4 1,2 略有提高 2 946.46 24.81
5 3,4 显著提高 39.94 0.34
Tab.3  研究区景观生态风险评价修正结果与原始结果分级差值的对应分区
Fig.8  研究区景观生态风险评价对比结果
[1] 生态屏障、功能区划与人口发展课题组. 建设国家生态屏障,促进人口资源环境协调发展——关于内蒙古、甘肃等8省区人口资源环境问题的调研报告[J]. 人口研究, 2008,32(2):1-4.
Research group on ecological barrier,functional zoning and population development. Build national ecological barrier to promote coordinated development of population,resources and environment:Research report on problems of population,resources and environment in 8 provinces and regions including Inner Mongolia,Gansu,et al.[J]. Population Research, 2008,32(2):1-4.
[2] 王玉宽, 孙雪峰, 邓玉林, 等. 对生态屏障概念内涵与价值的认识[J]. 山地学报, 2005(7):431-436.
Wang Y K, Sun X F, Deng Y L, et al. Discussion on concept definition and academic value of ecological defence[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2005(7):431-436.
[3] 曹祺文, 张曦文, 马洪坤, 等. 景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架:ESRISK[J]. 地理学报, 2018,73(5):843-855.
Cao Q W, Zhang X W, Ma H K, et al. Review of landscape ecological risk and an assessment framework based on ecological services:ESRISK[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(5):843-855.
[4] 彭建, 党威雄, 刘焱序, 等. 景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2015,70(4):664-677.
Peng J, Dang W X, Liu Y X, et al. Review on landscape ecological risk assessment[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(4):664-677.
[5] 周利军, 张雪萍, 陈设. 扎龙自然保护区土地利用变化与生态风险评价[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2009(2):186-190.
Zhou L J, Zhang X P, Chen S. Land use change and ecological risk assessment of Zhalong Natural Protection area[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2009(2):186-190.
[6] 巩杰, 赵彩霞, 谢余初, 等. 基于景观格局的甘肃白龙江流域生态风险评价与管理[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014(7):2041-2048.
pmid: 25345056
Gong J, Zhao C X, Xie Y C, et al. Ecological risk assessment and its management of Bailongjiang watershed,southern Gansu based on landscape pattern[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014(7):2041-2048.
pmid: 25345056
[7] 张月, 张飞, 周梅, 等. 干旱区内陆艾比湖区域景观生态风险评价及时空分异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(1):233-242.
pmid: 27228614
Zhang Y, Zhang F, Zhou M, et al. Landscape ecological risk assessment and its spatio-temporal variations in Ebinur Lake region of inland arid area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(1):233-242.
pmid: 27228614
[8] 潘竟虎, 刘晓. 疏勒河流域景观生态风险评价与生态安全格局优化构建[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016,35(3):791-799.
Pan J H, Liu X. Landscape ecological risk assessment and landscape security pattern optimization in Shule River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016,35(3):791-799.
[9] 李月月, 黄义雄, 杨阳, 等. 基于景观结构的福建省沿海生态风险时空特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(4):241-246.
Li Y Y, Huang Y X, Yang Y, et al. Temporal and spatial characteristics of coastal ecological risk in the Fujian Province based on landscape structure[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,38(4):241-246.
[10] 奚世军, 安裕伦, 李阳兵, 等. 基于景观格局的喀斯特山区流域生态风险评估——以贵州省乌江流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019,28(3):712-721.
Xi S J, An Y L, Li Y B, et al. Ecological risk assessment of Karst mountain watershed based on landscape pattern:A case study of Wujiang River Basin in Guizhou Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019,28(3):712-721.
[11] 李小燕, 柳书俊, 王志杰. 南水北调中线汉中市水源地景观生态风险评价与特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019,26(5):181-187.
Li X Y, Liu S J, Wang Z J. Landscape ecological risk characteristics of water source site in Hanzhong City of the middle route of the South-to-North water transfer project of China[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,26(5):181-187.
[12] 孙贤斌, 刘红玉. 江苏盐城市海滨土地利用对景观生态风险的影响[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2011,23(3):140-145.doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2011.03.25.
doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2011.03.25
Sun X B, Liu H Y. The effect of land use on landscape ecological risk in Yancheng coastal area,Jiangsu Province[J]. Remote Sensing for Land and Resource, 2011,23(3):140-145.doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2011.03.25.
[13] Yu Z L, Qin T L. The impact on the ecosystem services value of the ecological shelter zone reconstruction in the upper reaches basin of the Yangtze River in China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018(15):2273.
[14] 余凡. 土地利用总体规划中生态屏障用地布局研究——以江西省九江市星子县为例[D]. 南昌:江西财经大学, 2010.
Yu F. On land layout of ecological shelter zone in general land use planning:A case study of Xingzi County in Jiujiang City,Jiangxi Province[D]. Nanchang:Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2010.
[15] 王雪军, 黄国胜, 张煜星, 等. 基于资源环境承载力的赣州市生态屏障布局[J]. 福建林业科技, 2014(6):161-165.
Wang X J, Huang G S, Zhang Y X, et al. The layout of its ecological protective barrier in Ganzhou City based on regional carrying capacity of resources and environments[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2014(6):161-165.
[16] 陈书卿, 刁承泰, 周春蓉. 土地利用规划中生态屏障体系的构建及功能区划研究——以重庆市永川区为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2011(2):105-111.
Chen S Q, Diao C T, Zhou C R. Study on reconstruction and functional regionalization of ecological shelter zone in land use planning:A case study of Yongchuan District,Chongqing City[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011(2):105-111.
[17] 曾勇. 区域生态风险评价——以呼和浩特市区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010,30(3):668-673.
Zeng Y. The regional ecological risk assessment of Hohhot City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010,30(3):668-673.
[18] 蒋蕾, 杜明月. 基于生态系统服务的农安县景观生态风险评价[J]. 环境生态学, 2019,1(3):39-45.
Jiang L, Du M Y. Landscape ecological risk assessment based on ecosystem services of Nong’an County[J]. Environmental Ecology, 2019,1(3):39-45.
[19] 汤洁, 李红薇, 李昭阳, 等. 太平池湿地区域生态系统服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017,45(7):224-230.
Tang J, Li H W, Li Z Y, et al. Response of ecosystem service value to land use change in the region of Taipingchi Wetland[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2017,45(7):224-230.
[20] 汪雪格, 王彦梅, 魏春凤. 吉林省西部湿地现状及恢复改善对策[C]// 2017第九届全国河湖治理与水生态文明发展论坛论文集, 2017:72-75.
Wang X G, Wang Y M, Wei C F. Present situation of west wetland in Jilin Province and countermeasures for restoration[C]// Proceedings of the Ninth National Forum on River and Lake Governance and the Development of Water Ecological Civilization, 2017:72-75.
[1] 孟清, 白红英, 赵婷, 郭少壮, 齐贵增. 秦岭山地对气溶胶的生态屏障效应[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2021, 33(1): 240-248.
[2] 方国华, 周磊, 闻昕, 薛刘宇, 严春华. 南水北调东线江苏受水区土地利用变化模拟及生态安全评价[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2017, 29(3): 163-170.
[3] 杜培军, 陈宇, 谭琨. 湿地景观格局与生态安全遥感监测分析——以江苏滨海湿地为例[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2014, 26(1): 158-166.
[4] 虞继进, 陈雪玲, 陈绍杰. 基于遥感和PSR模型的城市景观生态安全评价——以福建省龙岩市为例[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2013, 25(1): 143-149.
[5] 孙贤斌, 刘红玉. 江苏盐城市海滨土地利用对景观生态风险的影响[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2011, 23(3): 140-145.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-2
版权所有 © 2015 《自然资源遥感》编辑部
地址:北京学院路31号中国国土资源航空物探遥感中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060291/62060292 E-mail:zrzyyg@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发