The microseepage of the volatile element in oil and gas through the cover layer to the surface produces ground geochemical anormal.Remote sensing as a new technology has been applyed in the prospecting of ground anormal indication of oil and gas.This paper mainly introduces oversea ground soil variation, rock alteration and geobotaincal anormal in oil site due to the hydrocarbon microseepage prospects forming mechanics of these phynomenon; provides effectical methods of hydrocarbon microseepage prospecting through utlizing remote sensing by oil experts and hopes to get the goal of further study and development of oil remote sensing.
张磊. 国外遥感技术在烃类微渗漏探测中的应用简介[J]. 国土资源遥感, 1995, 7(1): 55-60.
Zhang Lei. THE APPLICATION OF THE REMOTE SERSING TECHNOLOGY IN THE PROSPECTING OF THE HYDROCARBON MICROSEEPAGE. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 1995, 7(1): 55-60.
[1] Richard F, Brian J. "physical. Geology", second edition, Inc., New York: John wiley and sons, 1977
[2] Donovan T J.surface magnetic indicators of buried hydrocarbons. acromagnetic detection and separation of spurious signals, Fifth thematic conference on remote sensing for exploration geology.1986,19-232
[3] Donovan T J, Dalziel M C. Late diagcnetic indicators of buried oil and gas. u. s. Geol. Survey Open-file Report 77-817, 1977, 449.
[4] Ronald J Staskowski. The leelauau. Benzie and grand traverse.Michigan anomalies——structural and geobotanical indicators of hydrocarbon microseepage, The internatioral symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment. 3rd Thematic conference Remote Sensing for Exploration Geology.Colora-do,1984:53-64.
[5] Steven J, Tkach. Geobotarical exploration for hydrocarbons. an investigation of leaf morphology for remote sensing, Proceedings of the sixth thematic conference on remote sensing for exploration geology, 1988:623-630.
[6] Barrett N Rock. Remote sensing of geobotanical anomalies association with hydrocarbon macrosee-page. International symposium on remote of environment, 3rd Thematic conference remote sensing for exploration geology. Colorado,1984:183-195.
[7] Bray D F. Gas injury to shade trees: Science Tree Topics, Vol 2;1958, 19-22.
[8] Allon M Feder, Remote Sensing detection of mieroseepages in hydrocarbon exploration. exploration lnternational symposium of environment, 4th thematic conference Proceedings of remote Sersing for geology. 1985: 79-92,
[9] Nicholas Reid. High resolution imaging of geobotanical anomalies association with subsurface hydro-carbons.Proceedings of the sixth thematic,conference on remote sensing for exploration geology 1988, 213-223.
[10] Michael F crawford. Preliminary evaluation of remote sensing data for detection of vegetation stress related to hydrocarbm microseepage: Mist gas field,oregon. Proceedings of the fifth thematic conference on remote sensing for exploration geology.1936: 161-173
[11] John A Mckeon.Proceeding of Multidate landsat TM Date to Map Soil Calor variations Relatod to Hydrocarhon microseepage in cropland setting:Cement,oklahomahoest Test . The fifth thematic conference on Remote Sensing for exploration geology.1986:347-361.
[12] Simpson C J. Remote Sensing of Petroleum gas seepage alteration: pain vally gas field. amadeus basin, central Australia. The Eighth thematic conference on geologic remote sensing, Colorado.U. S. A. 1991: 1463-1472.
[13] Scott L F. A closer look at the patrick draw oil field vegetation anomaly. Proceedings of the sixth thematic conferenee on remote sensing for exploration geology 1988, 529-538.
1995, Vol. 7 
