Please wait a minute...
 
自然资源遥感  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (1): 67-76    DOI: 10.6046/zrzyyg.2022430
  技术方法 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于MSPAP-MCRF的干旱区层级生态网络构建与优化——以宁夏中卫市为例
刘园园(), 马彩虹(), 滑雨琪, 李聪慧, 杨航
宁夏大学地理科学与规划学院,银川 750021
MSPAP-MCRF-based construction and optimization of a hierarchical ecological network for arid regions: A case study of Zhongwei City, Ningxia
LIU Yuanyuan(), MA Caihong(), HUA Yuqi, LI Conghui, YANG hang
School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
全文: PDF(9284 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

基于Landsat8 OLI_TIRS遥感影像、数字高程模型(digital elevation model,DEM)、路网、水系等多源数据,修正能量因子模型和重力模型,改进了形态学空间格局分析(morphological spatial pattern analysis,MSPA)和最小累积阻力模型(minimum cumulative resistance,MCR)生态网络构建方法,以宁夏中卫市为例,探讨了层级生态网络的构建及其优化。结果表明: ①干旱区生态源地识别中,需要将林地、草地和水体作为前景数据,并结合生态红线选择生态源地; ② 中卫市生态网络呈现出“四核三廊多点”的空间结构模式。识别出生态源地17个,占研究区面积的22.33%,其中1级和2级共计4个源地的能量因子显著高于其他源地,形成“四核”,其他源地形成“多点”,生成潜在生态廊道33条,其中一级生态廊道3条,形成“三廊”; ③ 从生态源地质量提升、廊道加固、断裂点修复等方面提出了生态网络优化策略,除1号、7号、9号源地之间的廊道较为稳定外,其他源地间连通性较低,生态网络稳定性较差,需要建立24个生态踏脚石,并发现38个亟待开展修复的生态断裂点; ④ 优化后生态网络的稳定性有所提升,α指数、β指数和γ指数分别提升9.5%,3.8%和4.2%,有利于促进生态物质及信息流动和生物多样性保护。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘园园
马彩虹
滑雨琪
李聪慧
杨航
关键词 形态学空间格局分析法(MSPA)最小累积阻力模型(MCR)层级生态网络干旱区黄河上游    
Abstract

Based on data from multiple sources including Landsat8 OLI_TIRS remote sensing images, digital elevation model (DEM), road networks, and water system, as well as the corrected energy factor model and gravity model, this study improved the method for ecological network construction based on morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) and the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model. Using the method, this study constructed and optimized a hierarchical ecological network for Zhongwei City, Ningxia. The results show that: ① The identification of ecological source areas in arid regions should be conducted using the data of woodland, grassland, and water bodies as foreground data and woodland and selecting ecological source areas based on ecological redlines; ② The ecological network of Zhongwei City presents a spatial structure mode characterized by four cores, three first-level ecological corridors, and multiple minor ecological source areas. Seventeen ecological source areas were identified, accounting for 22.33% of the study area. Among them, four grade-1 and -2 source areas exhibited significantly high energy factors, forming four cores. A total of 33 potential ecological corridors were identified, including three grade-1 ecological corridors; ③ Strategies for optimizing the ecological network, including improving ecological source areas’ quality, enhancing corridors, and restoring ecological breaking points. Except for the stable corridors connecting Nos. 1, 7, and 9 source areas, other source areas manifest poor connectivity, leading to low ecological network stability. Therefore, it is necessary to establish 24 ecological stepping stones. Furthermore, 38 ecological breaking points requiring urgent restoration were discovered; (4) The optimized ecological network demonstrates enhanced stability, with α, β, and γ indices elevated at 9.5%, 3.8%, and 4.2%, respectively. This network will promote the flow of ecological materials/information and biodiversity conservation.

Key wordsmorphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA)    minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model    hierarchical ecological network    arid region    upper reaches of the Yellow River
收稿日期: 2022-11-02      出版日期: 2024-03-13
ZTFLH:  TP79  
  X171.1  
基金资助:宁夏重点研发基金项目“宁夏黄河流域城市-生态高冲突区生态网络结构优化关键技术研究与应用”(2021BEG03019);国家自然科学基金项目“宁夏六盘山贫困区‘三生’空间融合发展的动力机制及模式研究”(41961034);宁夏自然科学重点基金项目“城乡一体化视角下宁夏沿黄经济带生态网络构建与优化研究”(2020AAC02008)
通讯作者: 马彩虹(1974-),女,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事资源环境评价与GIS/RS应用。Email: mchyanni@163.com
作者简介: 刘园园(1998-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事国土空间分析与生态系统服务价值分析。Email: lyy980617@163.com
引用本文:   
刘园园, 马彩虹, 滑雨琪, 李聪慧, 杨航. 基于MSPAP-MCRF的干旱区层级生态网络构建与优化——以宁夏中卫市为例[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2024, 36(1): 67-76.
LIU Yuanyuan, MA Caihong, HUA Yuqi, LI Conghui, YANG hang. MSPAP-MCRF-based construction and optimization of a hierarchical ecological network for arid regions: A case study of Zhongwei City, Ningxia. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2024, 36(1): 67-76.
链接本文:  
https://www.gtzyyg.com/CN/10.6046/zrzyyg.2022430      或      https://www.gtzyyg.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I1/67
Fig.1  研究区位置和范围
景观类型 含义 阈值
核心区 生境斑块较大,可为物种提供较大栖息地,作为生态源地 17/117
孔隙 核心区和非绿色景观斑块之间的过渡区域,即内部斑块边缘,具有边缘效应 5/105
孤岛 连接度较低,内部物质、能量交流和传递可能性较小,不相连的孤立、破碎小斑块 9/109
边缘区 核心区和主要非绿色景观区域之间的过渡区域 3/103
环岛 连接统一核心区的廊道,规模小、与外围自然斑块的连接度低 65/165
桥接区 连接核心区的狭长区域,对生物迁移和景观连接具有重要意义 33/133
支线 只有一端与其他景观类型相连的区域 1/101
Tab.1  MSPA景观类型及含义
阻力因子 分级指标 阻力值 权重
高程/m <1 300 10 0.07
[1 300,1 500) 50
[1 500,1 700) 70
[1 700,1 900) 100
[1 900,2 100) 120
≥2 100 150
坡度/(°) <8 10 0.13
[15,25) 20
[15,25) 30
[25,35) 50
≥35 100
土地利用
类型
林地 10 0.36
水域 20
草地 30
耕地 70
未利用地 100
建设用地 120
植被覆盖度/% <30 120 0.24
[30,40) 80
[40,50) 50
[50,60) 30
≥60 10
道路/m <20 220 0.20
[20,50) 180
[50,80) 140
[80,110) 100
≥110 60
Tab.2  阻力值体系评价表
Fig.2  MSPA景观要素面积及比例
Fig.3  MSPA景观要素空间分布及生态源地提取结果图
Fig.4  生态源地内林水草构成比例
生态红线
源地编号
总面积/
hm2
面积百
分比/%
能量因子 自然保护区
保护等级
0 14 390.52 4.55 0.10
1 7 063.96 2.23 0.07
2 29 293.02 9.26 0.70 一(国家级)
3 5 986.16 1.89 0.05
4 4 594.56 1.45 0.04
5 23 011.42 7.28 0.13
6 6 283.52 1.99 0.05
7 74 378.28 23.52 0.12
8 4 436.65 1.40 0.04
9 16 038.31 5.07 0.08
10 6 244.36 1.97 0.50 二(省级)
11 66 763.00 21.12 0.10
12 15 008.12 4.75 0.65 二(省级)
13 1 139.62 0.36 0.01
14 8 505.66 2.69 1.00 一(国家级)
16 9 561.29 3.02 0.05
17 12 119.91 3.83 0.05
Tab.3  重要生态源地景观要素面积与比例
Fig.5  单因子阻力面及综合阻力面
Fig.6  源地间引力值及累积贡献率
Fig.7  潜在生态廊道分布
Fig.8  中卫市“四核三廊多点”生态网络结构
[1] 徐伟振, 黄思颖, 耿建伟, 等. 基于MCR和重力模型下的厦门市生态空间网络构建[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2022, 37(2):264-272.
Xu W Z, Huang S Y, Geng J W, et al. Construction of ecological space network in Xiamen City based on MCR and gravity model[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2022, 37(2):264-272.
[2] 高宇, 木皓可, 张云路, 等. 基于MSPA分析方法的市域尺度绿色网络体系构建路径优化研究——以招远市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7547-7556.
Gao Y, Mu H K, Zhang Y L, et al. Research on construction path optimization of urban-scale green network system based on MSPA analysis method: Taking Zhaoyuan City as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7547-7556.
[3] 张晴, 郭志威, 齐开, 等. 基于MSPA和MCR模型的襄阳市生态网络变化研究[J]. 湖北大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(2): 162-170.
Zhang Q, Guo Z W, Qi K, et al. Variation of ecological network in Xiangyang City based on MSPA and MCR model[J]. Journal of Hubei University(Natural Science), 2022, 44(2): 162-170.
[4] 曲艺, 陆明. 生态网络规划研究进展与发展趋势[J]. 城市发展研究, 2016, 23(8): 29-36.
Qu Y, Lu M. Research progress and development trend of ecological network planning[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2016, 23(8): 29-36.
[5] 周振宏, 王绘绘, 朱庆山, 等. 马鞍山市生态网络识别与优化[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 45(1): 35-41.
Zhou Z H, Wang H H, Zhu Q S, et al. Identification and optimization of ecological network in Ma’anshan City[J]. Journal of Anhui Normal University (Natural Science), 2022, 45(1): 35-41.
[6] 陈昕, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等. 基于“重要性-敏感性-连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3):471-484.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703006
Chen X, Peng J, Liu Y X, et al. Constructing ecological security patterns in Yunfu City based on the framework of importance-Sensitivity-Connectivity[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3):471-484.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703006
[7] 陈南南, 康帅直, 赵永华, 等. 基于MSPA和MC模型的秦岭(陕西段)山地生态网络构建[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1545-1553.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.012
Chen N N, Kang S Z, Zhao Y H, et al. Construction of ecological network in Qinling Mountains of Shaanxi,China based on MSPA and MCR model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(5): 1545-1553.
[8] 张启舜, 李飞雪, 王帝文, 等. 基于生态网络的江苏省生态空间连通性变化研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(8): 3007-3020.
Zhang Q S, Li F X, Wang D W, et al. Analysis on changes of ecological spatial connectivity in Jiangsu Province based on ecological network[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(8): 3007-3020.
[9] 宋利利, 秦明周, 张鹏岩, 等. 基于图论的景观图表达、分析及应用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10): 3579-3588.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202010.014
Song L L, Qin M Z, Zhang P Y, et al. Representation,analysis and application of landscape graph based on graph theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(10): 3579-3588.
[10] 沈钦炜, 林美玲, 莫惠萍, 等. 佛山市生态网络构建及优化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3288-3298.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.019
Shen Q W, Lin M L, Mo H P, et al. Ecological network construction and optimization in Foshan City,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(9): 3288-3298.
[11] 黄河, 余坤勇, 高雅玲, 等. 基于MSPA的福州绿色基础设施网络构建[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(11): 70-75.
Huang H, Yu K Y, Gao Y L, et al. Building green infrastructure network of Fuzhou using MSPA[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(11): 70-75.
[12] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703001
Peng J, Zhao H J, Liu Y X, et al. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703001
[13] 王雪然, 万荣荣, 潘佩佩. 太湖流域生态安全格局构建与调控——基于空间形态学-最小累积阻力模型[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(5): 1968-1980.
Wang X R, Wan R R, Pan P P. Construction and adjustment of ecological security pattern based on MSPA-MCR model in Taihu Lake basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(5): 1968-1980.
[14] 王玉莹, 金晓斌, 沈春竹, 等. 东部发达区生态安全格局构建——以苏南地区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(7): 2298-2310.
Wang Y Y, Jin X B, Shen C Z, et al. Establishment of an ecological security pattern in the eastern developed regions:A case study of the Sunan District[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(7): 2298-2310.
[15] 朱捷, 苏杰, 尹海伟, 等. 基于源地综合识别与多尺度嵌套的徐州生态网络构建[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1986-2001.
doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200817
Zhu J, Su J, Yin H W, et al. Construction of Xuzhou ecological network based on comprehensive sources identification and multi-scale nesting[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1986-2001.
doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200817
[16] 王戈, 于强, Yang D, 等. 基于复杂网络分析法的层级生态网络结构研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(7): 258-266,312.
Wang G, Yu Q, Yang D, et al. Hierarchical ecological network structure based on complex network analysis[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2019, 50(7): 258-266,312.
[17] 姚晓洁, 胡宇, 李久林, 等. 基于“压力-状态-响应模式”的安徽省临泉县生态安全格局构建[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2020, 47(4): 538-546.
Yao X J, Hu Y, Li J L, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern based on ‘pressure-state-response model’ in Linquan County of Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2020, 47(4): 538-546.
[18] Vogt P, Riitters K H, Iwanowski M, et al. Mapping landscape corridors[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2007, 7(2): 481-488.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.001
[19] Vgot P, Ritters K. GudiosToolbox:Universal digital image object analysis[J]. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, 50(1): 352-361
doi: 10.1080/22797254.2017.1330650
[20] 吴昌广, 周志翔, 王鹏程, 等. 景观连接度的概念、度量及其应用[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(7): 1903-1910.
Wu C G, Zhou Z X, Wang P C, et al. The concept and measurement of landscape connectivity and its applications[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(7): 1903-1910.
[21] 谢花林, 李秀彬. 基于GIS的农村住区生态重要性空间评价及其分区管制——以兴国县长冈乡为例[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(1): 230-238.
Xie H L, Li X B. Spatial assessment and zoning regulations of ecological importance based on GIS for rural habitation in Changgang Town,Xingguo County[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(1): 230-238.
[22] 刘常富, 李京泽, 李小马, 等. 基于模拟景观的城市森林景观格局指数选取[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(5): 1125-1131.
Liu C F, Li J Z, Li X M, et al. Selection of landscape metrics for urban forest based on simulated landscapes[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(5): 1125-1131.
[23] 陈竹安, 况达, 危小建, 等. 基于MSPA与MCR模型的余江县生态网络构建[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(8): 1199-1207.
Chen Z A, Quang D, Wei X J, et al. Developing ecological networks based on MSPA and MCR: A case study in Yujiang County[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2017, 26(8): 1199-1207.
[24] 黄木易, 岳文泽, 冯少茹, 等. 基于MCR模型的大别山核心区生态安全格局异质性及优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 771-784.
doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190408
Huang M Y, Yue W Z, Feng S R, et al. Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of ecological security based on MCR model and ecological pattern optimization in the Yuexi County of the Dabie Mountain area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4): 771-784.
doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190408
[25] 孔阳, 王思元. 基于MSPA模型的北京市延庆区城乡生态网络构建[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(7): 113-121.
Kong Y, Wang S Y. Construction of urban and rural ecological network in Yanqing District of Beijing based on MSPA model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(7): 113-121.
[26] 周英, 施成超, 刘滢, 等. 基于MSPA-MCR模型的云南德昂族乡景观生态安全格局构建[J]. 西南林业大学学报(社会科学), 2022, 6(1): 54-62.
Zhou Y, Shi C C, Liu Y, et al. Construction of landscape ecological security pattern of Deang ethnic group township in Yunnan based on MSPA-MCR model[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Social Sciences), 2022, 6(1): 54-62.
[1] 黄晓宇, 王雪梅, 卡吾恰提·白山. 基于Landsat8 OLI影像干旱区绿洲土壤含盐量反演[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2023, 35(1): 189-197.
[2] 高琪, 王玉珍, 冯春晖, 马自强, 柳维扬, 彭杰, 季彦桢. 基于改进型光谱指数的荒漠土壤水分遥感反演[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2022, 34(1): 142-150.
[3] 田绍鸿, 张显峰. 采用随机森林法的天绘数据干旱区城市土地覆盖分类[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2016, 28(1): 43-49.
[4] 李晓明, 杨劲松, 余美, 杨奇勇, 刘梅先. 基于电磁感应的干旱区土壤盐渍化定量遥感研究[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2012, 24(1): 53-58.
[5] 朱刚, 高会军, 曾光, 金谋顺. 西北内陆干旱区河流绿色走廊湿地景观格局变化及其生态效应研究—以车尔臣河下游为例[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2010, 22(s1): 219-223.
[6] 王飞跃, 王俊锋, 吴军虎, 万余庆. 西部干旱区卫星雷达遥感找水试验研究[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2000, 12(4): 14-18,27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-2
版权所有 © 2015 《自然资源遥感》编辑部
地址:北京学院路31号中国国土资源航空物探遥感中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060291/62060292 E-mail:zrzyyg@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发