Please wait a minute...
 
国土资源遥感  2013, Vol. 25 Issue (3): 102-108    DOI: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2013.03.18
  技术应用 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于遥感和GIS的北京湿地生态服务功能评价与分区
苗李莉1,2, 蒋卫国1,3, 王世东2, 朱琳4
1. 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京 100875;
2. 北京师范大学资源学院, 北京 100875;
3. 北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室,北京 100875;
4. 首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院,北京 100048
Comprehensive assessments and zoning of ecological service functions for Beijing wetland based on RS and GIS
MIAO Lili1,2, JIANG Weiguo1,3, WANG Shidong2, ZHU Lin4
1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. College of Resources, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
4. College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
全文: PDF(2760 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

湿地(特别是大城市湿地)的分布、生态服务功能及其管理与城市的生态环境和居民生活质量关系密切。以北京市湿地为例,综合运用遥感、基础地理、野外实测和社会统计等多源数据,借鉴千年生态系统评估(millennium ecosystem assessment,MA)概念框架,利用价值量评价方法,构建基于遥感与GIS的城市湿地生态服务功能评价指标体系; 以行政区(县)为评价单元,应用层次分析(analytic hierarchy process,AHP)和综合指数等方法对湿地生态服务功能的构成要素进行综合建模分析; 分别对北京湿地的"调节"、"供给"、"文化"和"支持"功能类别及其功能综合进行评价分析,得到北京湿地4个功能类别及其综合的湿地功能重要程度分级格局。研究结果表明: ①在北京湿地生态服务功能类型中,"调节"和"供给"功能最重要,"文化"功能次之,"支持"功能最弱; ②就北京市各区县湿地综合功能的重要性等级而论,密云湿地为"最重要湿地",房山、东城、西城、朝阳、延庆和怀柔的湿地为"重要湿地",平谷、通州、海淀和门头沟的湿地为"比较重要湿地",而大兴、昌平、顺义、石景山和丰台的湿地为"一般重要湿地"。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
黄燕平
陈劲松
关键词 森林生物量干涉相干性极化    
Abstract

The distribution, eco-service functions and the managements of wetlands especially for metropolis have a close relationship with the quality of eco-environments and city resident life. In this paper, a metropolis, Beijing, was selected as a typical study area, and the research activities were supported by the spatial information technologies such as remote sensing and GIS, and the multi-kinds of data such as remote sensing image data, survey data in fields and society statistics data were applied. According to the assessment framework of millennium ecosystem assessment (MA), a value evaluation method was used for constructing an assessment index system of wetland eco-services functions. For the requirements of assessment operations, the authors considered that the administrative districts and counties in Beijing could be taken as the assessing units. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was applied to the weight calculation of each indicator. Then the comprehensive and quantitative indexes were defined and calculated at each assessing unit in the study area. The evaluation of Beijing wetlands ecological services included the adjustment functions, supply functions, culture functions, supporting functions and comprehensive functions. Through investigations, the distribution patterns of Beijing wetlands ecological services were summed up. Some conclusions have been reached: ① the regulating and provisioning functions of wetlands in Beijing are the most important, followed by the cultural function, and the supporting function plays a weaker role; ② the order of the composite function intensity from highness to weakness in the whole assessment units is as follows: Miyun County takes the first place, the districts of Fangshan, Dongchen, Xichen, Chaoyang, Yanqing and Huairou possess the second importance, and the districts of Pinggu, Tongzhou, Haidian and Mentougou occupy the third place, whereas the other districts play the weakest role.

Key wordsforest biomass    SAR    remote sensing    interference coherence    polarization
收稿日期: 2012-12-19      出版日期: 2013-07-03
:  TP 79  
  X 82  
基金资助:

国家科技合作计划项目(编号: 2009DFA91710)、北京市科技计划项目(编号: D08040600580801 )、北京市自然科学基金项目(编号: 8082015)、国家水污染控制与治理科技重大专项(编号: 2009ZX07529-007,2009ZX07528-004)共同资助。

作者简介: 苗李莉(1978-),女,博士研究生,主要从事湿地生态与环境遥感应用研究。 E-mail: miaolili@mail.bnu.edu.cn。
引用本文:   
苗李莉, 蒋卫国, 王世东, 朱琳. 基于遥感和GIS的北京湿地生态服务功能评价与分区[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2013, 25(3): 102-108.
MIAO Lili, JIANG Weiguo, WANG Shidong, ZHU Lin. Comprehensive assessments and zoning of ecological service functions for Beijing wetland based on RS and GIS. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2013, 25(3): 102-108.
链接本文:  
https://www.gtzyyg.com/CN/10.6046/gtzyyg.2013.03.18      或      https://www.gtzyyg.com/CN/Y2013/V25/I3/102

[1] 孙广友,王海霞,于少鹏.城市湿地研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2004,23(5):94-100. Sun G Y,Wang H X,Yu S P.The advance of urban wetland study[J]. Progress in Geography,2004,23(5):94-100.

[2] 徐守国,郭辉军,田昆.湿地功能研究进展[J].环境与可持续发展,2006(5):12-14. Xu S G,Guo H J,Tian K.Progress in research of wetlands function[J].Environment and Sustainable Development,2006(5):12-14.

[3] 袁军,吕宪国.湿地功能评价研究进展[J].湿地科学,2004,2(2):153-160. Yuan J,Lü X G.Progress in research of functional assessment of wetlands[J].Wetland Science,2004,2(2):153-160.

[4] Costanza R,Darge R,De Groot R,et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.

[5] 辛琨,肖笃宁.盘锦地区湿地生态系统服务功能价值估算[J].生态学报,2002,22(8):1345-1349. Xin K,Xiao D N.Wetland ecosystem service valuation-a case researches on Panjin area[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2002,22(8):1345-1349.

[6] 王斌,杨校生,张彪,等.浙江省滨海湿地生态系统服务及其价值研究[J].湿地科学,2012,10(1):15-22. Wang B,Yang X S,Zhang B,et al.Assessment of ecosystem services and value of coastal wetlands in Zhejiang Province[J].Wetland Science,2012,10(1):15-22.

[7] 刘飞.淮北市南湖湿地生态系统服务及价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(10):1818-1828. Liu F.Evaluation on ecosystem services in Nanhu wetland of Huaibei City[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2009,24(10):1818-1828.

[8] 刘晓辉,吕宪国,姜明,等.湿地生态系统服务功能的价值评估[J].生态学报,2008,28(11):5625-5631. Liu X H,Lü X G,Jiang M,et al.Research on the valuation of wetland ecosystem services[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2008,28(11):5625-5631.

[9] 牛赟,刘贤德,张宏斌,等.黑河流域中上游湿地生态功能评价[J].湿地科学,2007,5(3):215-220. Niu Y,Liu X D,Zhang H B,et al.The ecological function evaluation of wetland in upper and middle reaches of Heihe Basin[J].Wetland Science,2007,5(3):215-220.

[10] 袁军,吕宪国.湿地功能评价两级模糊模式识别模型的建立及应用[J].林业科学,2005,41(4):1-6. Yuan J,Lü X G.Development and application of a dual-grade fuzzy pattern recognition model on functional assessment of wetlands[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2005,41(4):1-6.

[11] 李文华,张彪,谢高地.中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(1):1-10. Li W H,Zhang B,Xie G D.Research on ecosystem services in China:Progress and perspectives[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2009,24(1):1-10.

[12] 张伟,张宏业,张义丰.生态系统服务功能价值核算与地理学综合研究[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(3):465-470. Zhang W,Zhang H Y,Zhang Y F.Evaluation of ecosystem services value and integrated study in geography[J].Progress in Geography,2009,28(3):465-470.

[13] 任曼丽.城市湿地生态系统服务功能及其价值评估——以开封市湿地为例[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(16):6935-6938. Ren M L.Evaluation on the serving functions and value of urban wetland ecosystem[J].Journal of Anhui Agri culutual sciences,2008,36(16):6935-6938.

[14] Zhu L,Xiao Y F,Jing L L,et al.Evaluating social service value of wetlands in Beijing based on remote sensing and GIS[C]//Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium(IGARSS),2010:IEEE International:378-381.

[15] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board.Ecosystem services and human well-being:wetlands and water Synthesis[M].Washington:World Resources Institute,2005.

[16] 程洋,陈建平,皇甫江云,等.基于RS和GIS的岩溶石漠化恶化趋势定量预测——以广西都安瑶族自治县典型容溶石漠化地区为例[J].国土资源遥感,2012,24(3):135-139. Cheng Y,Chen J P,Huang fu J Y,et al.Quantitative prediction of karst rocky desertification deterioration based on RS and GIS:A case study of typical Karst rocky desertification area of Du’an County,Guangxi[J].Remote Sensing for Land and Resources,2012,24(3):135-139.

[17] 杨斌,顾秀梅,姜晓鹏.AHP法和GIS技术在城镇化空间发展分析中的应用——以低山丘陵革命老区梓潼县为例[J].国土资源遥感,2012,24(4):169-174. Yang B,Gu X M,Jiang X P.The application of AHP and GIS to the analysis of urbanization spatial development:A case study of Zitong County,a low mountain hilly old revolutionary base area[J].Remote Sensing for Land and Resources,2012,24(4):169-174.

[18] 赵焕臣,许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].北京:科学出版社,1986. Zhao H C,Xu S B.Analytic hierarchy process[M].Bejing:Science Press,1986.

[19] 傅娇艳,丁振华.湿地生态系统服务、功能和价值评价研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(3):681-686. Fu J Y,Ding Z H.Research progress on wetland ecosystem services and valuation[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2007,18(3):681-686.

[20] 何池全,崔保山,赵志春.吉林省典型湿地生态评价[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(5):754-757. He C Q,Cui B S,Zhao Z C.Ecological evaluation on typical wetlands in Jilin province[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2001,12(5):754-757.

[1] 何陈临秋, 程博, 陈金奋, 张晓平. 基于GF-3全极化SAR数据的滨海湿地信息提取方法[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(4): 105-110.
[2] 黄鹏艳, 卜丽静, 范永良. 结合视觉特征的极化SAR图像分类[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2020, 32(2): 88-93.
[3] 冯娟, 丁建丽, 魏雯瑜. 基于雷达数据的区域土壤盐渍化监测[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2019, 31(1): 195-203.
[4] 徐佳, 袁春琦, 程圆娥, 曾晨雨, 许康. 基于主动深度学习的极化SAR图像分类[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2018, 30(1): 72-77.
[5] 卜丽静, 黄鹏艳, 沈璐. 一种结合颜色特征的PolSAR图像分类方法[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2017, 29(3): 59-64.
[6] 周晓宇, 陈富龙, 姜爱辉. 基于SVM雷达卧龙大熊猫栖息地森林成图[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2017, 29(3): 85-91.
[7] 何连, 秦其明, 任华忠. 一种自适应的混合Freeman/Eigenvalue极化分解模型[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2017, 29(2): 8-14.
[8] 王世新, 田野, 周艺, 刘文亮, 林晨曦. 基于后向散射模型的多极化SAR影像建筑物高度提取[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2017, 29(2): 37-45.
[9] 许斌. 基于非高斯分布的全极化SAR数据无监督分类[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2017, 29(2): 90-96.
[10] 祁帅, 张永红, 汪慧琴. 林火干扰区全极化SAR影像的散射特性分析[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2016, 28(2): 48-53.
[11] 何海燕, 凌飞龙, 汪小钦, 梁志锋. 基于雷达植被指数的水土流失区植被覆盖度估测[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2015, 27(4): 165-170.
[12] 陈军, 杜培军, 谭琨. 一种改进的全极化SAR图像MCSM-Wishart非监督分类方法[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2015, 27(2): 15-21.
[13] 赵兴刚, 柳林, 钱静. 基于TerraSAR-X全极化数据的北极地区海冰信息提取[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2014, 26(3): 130-134.
[14] 王兴玲, 胡德勇, 唐宏, 舒阳. 基于Bayes决策的机载全极化SAR图像滑坡信息提取[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2014, 26(2): 121-127.
[15] 张冬华, 张春华, 刘芮, 姜焱光. 基于Mini-RF雷达数据的月球水冰探测[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2014, 26(1): 110-114.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-2
版权所有 © 2015 《自然资源遥感》编辑部
地址:北京学院路31号中国国土资源航空物探遥感中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060291/62060292 E-mail:zrzyyg@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发