Please wait a minute...
 
Remote Sensing for Land & Resources    2020, Vol. 32 Issue (4) : 8-15     DOI: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2020.04.02
|
A discussion on some frontier directions of quantitative remote sensing
QIN Qiming1,2(), CHEN Jin3, ZHANG Yongguang4, REN Huazhong1, WU Zihua1, ZHANG Chishan3, WU Linsheng4, LIU Jianli5
1. School of Earth and Space Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2. Technology Innovation Center for Geographic Information System Technology, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100871, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
4. International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
5. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
Download: PDF(1105 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

The key to improving the ability of independent innovation lies in talents and education. In order to cultivate high-quality innovative talents in the field of “quantitative remote sensing”, this summer course held an academic salon for graduate students in combination with the frontier issues of quantitative remote sensing that the trainees were concerned about. The academic salon held four academic salons aiming at the academic problems in the theory, method, technology and application of quantitative remote sensing. The mechanism of radiation transfer, the decomposition of hyperspectral remote sensing mixed pixels, the application and service of UAV quantitative remote sensing were discussed. Among them, the academic salon of “radiation transfer mechanism” mainly discussed the progress and limitations of radiation transfer theory from Maxwell’s equations to microcosmic physics. “Hyperspectral remote sensing mixed pixel decomposition” academic salon mainly focused on two aspects of endmember variability research, namely, the discussion of spectral variability within the same endmember category and the spectral similarity between different endmember categories. Participants deeply discussed the theory and method of how to eliminate the unmixing error of hyperspectral remote sensing mixed pixel. The “vegetation fluorescence remote sensing” academic salon mainly discussed the application progress of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) remote sensing, the process and mechanism of SIF excitation from leaf to sensor and its mechanism. Participants discussed five main issues in depth. “UAV quantitative remote sensing application and service” academic salon focused on UAV quantitative remote sensing and multi aircraft cooperative networking earth observation and remote sensing application service in complex scenes. Participants believed that UAV quantitative remote sensing application and service has broad prospects in the future. In each academic salon, a graduate student made a keynote speech. The participants would apply for a speech around the topic, discuss and question, and elaborate personal views or supplement relevant research progress information on relevant progress. The host would make a summary speech. The online academic salon provided a new academic platform for graduate students to exchange and discuss the frontier progress of quantitative remote sensing. The academic salon attracted many interested graduate students and other personnel to participate through live broadcast of bilibili station, and expanded the dissemination of quantitative remote sensing knowledge.

Keywords online academic salon      radiation transmission mechanism      mixed pixel decomposition      vegetation fluorescence remote sensing      UAV quantitative remote sensing     
:  TP79  
Issue Date: 23 December 2020
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Qiming QIN
Jin CHEN
Yongguang ZHANG
Huazhong REN
Zihua WU
Chishan ZHANG
Linsheng WU
Jianli LIU
Cite this article:   
Qiming QIN,Jin CHEN,Yongguang ZHANG, et al. A discussion on some frontier directions of quantitative remote sensing[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2020, 32(4): 8-15.
URL:  
https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/10.6046/gtzyyg.2020.04.02     OR     https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/Y2020/V32/I4/8
[1] 曾亮, 金亚秋. 随机介质中的矢量辐射传输理论[J]. 物理学进展, 1990(1):57-99.
[1] Zeng L, Jin Y Q. Vector radiative transfer theory in random media[J]. Progress in Physics, 1990(1):57-99.
[2] 金亚秋. 电磁散射和热辐射的遥感理论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993.
[2] Jin Y Q. Remote sensing theory of electromagnetic scattering and thermal radiation[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1993.
[3] Wendisch M, Yang P. Theory of atmospheric radiative transfer:A comprehensive introduction[J]. Contemporary Physics, 2012,53(6):506.
[4] Mishchenko M I. Vector radiative transfer equation for arbitrarily shaped and arbitrarily oriented particles:A microphysical derivation from statistical electromagnetics[J]. Applied Optics, 2002,41(33):7114-7134.
pmid: 12463259 url: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12463259
[5] Mishchenko M I. Microphysical approach to polarized radiative transfer:Extension to the case of an external observation points[J]. Applied Optics, 2003,42(24):4963-4967.
pmid: 12952344 url: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12952344
[6] Mishchenko M I. Maxwell’s equations,radiative transfer,and coherent backscattering:A general perspective[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2006,101(3):540-555.
[7] Tsang L, Kong J A. Scattering of electromagnetic waves:Advanced topics[M]. New York:John Wiley and Sons,Inc., 2001.
[8] Doicu A, Mishchenko M I. Overview of methods for deriving the radiative transfer theory from the Maxwell equations.I:Approach based on the far-field Foldy equations[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2018,220:123-139.
[9] Doicu A, Mishchenko M I. An overview of methods for deriving the radiative transfer theory from the Maxwell equations.II:Approach based on the Dyson and Bethe-Salpeter equations[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2019,224:25-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2018.10.032 pmid: 30713354 url: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30713354
[10] Doicu A, Mishchenko M I. Electromagnetic scattering by discrete random media.III:The vector radiative transfer equation[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2019,236:106564.
[11] Somers B, Asner G P, Tits L, et al. Endmember variability in spectral mixture analysis:A review[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011,115(7):1603-1616.
[12] Bioucas-Dias J M, Plaza A, Dobigeon N, et al. Hyperspectral unmixing overview:Geometrical,statistical,and sparse regression-based approaches[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2012,5(2):354-379.
[13] Boardman J W, Kruse F A, Green R O. Mapping target signatures via partial unmixing of aviris data[C]// JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop, 1995:23-26.
[14] Ridd M K. Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing:Comparative anatomy for cities?[J] International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1995,16(12):2165-2185.
doi: 10.1080/01431169508954549 url: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01431169508954549
[15] Keshava N, Mustard J F. Spectral unmixing[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2002,19(1):44-57.
[16] Adams J B, Smith M O, Johnson P E. Spectral mixture modeling:A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander-1 site[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1986,91(b8):8098-8112.
doi: 10.1029/JB091iB08p08098 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/JB091iB08p08098
[17] Zare A, Ho K C. Endmember variability in hyperspectral analysis:Addressing spectral variability during spectral unmixing[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2014,31(1):95-104.
doi: 10.1109/MSP.2013.2279177 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2013.2279177
[18] Dennison P E, Roberts D A. Endmember selection for multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis using endmember average RMSE[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003,87(2-3):123-135.
[19] Zhang J, Rivard B, Sánchez-Azofeifa A, et al. Intra- and inter-class spectral variability of tropical tree species at La Selva,Costa Rica:Implications for species identification using HYDICE imagery[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006,105(2):129-141.
[20] Zhang C S, Ma L, Chen J, et al. Assessing the impact of endmember variability on linear spectral mixture analysis (LSMA):A theoretical and simulation analysis[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019,235:111471.
[21] Frankenberg C, Fisher J B, Worden J, et al. New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT:Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011,38:L17706.
[22] Guanter L, Zhang Y, Jung M, et al. Global and time-resolved monitoring of crop photosynjournal with chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014,111:E1327-E1333.
pmid: 24706867 url: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24706867
[23] Guan K, Berry J A, Zhang Y, et al. Improving the monitoring of crop productivity using spaceborne solar-induced fluorescence[J]. Global Change Biology, 2016,22:716-726.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13136 pmid: 26490834 url: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26490834
[24] Peng B, Guan K, Zhou W, et al. Assessing the benefit of satellite-based solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in crop yield prediction[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2020,90:102126.
doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102126 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0303243419313029
[25] Daumard F, Champagne S, Fournier A, et al. A field platform for continuous measurement of canopy fluorescence[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010,48(9):3358-3368.
doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2046420 url: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5477165/
[26] Song L, Guanter L, Guan K Y, et al. Satellite sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence detects early response of winter wheat to heat stress in the Indian Indo-Gangetic Plains[J]. Global Change Bio-logy, 2018,24(9):4023-4037.
[27] Shan N, Ju W, Migliavacca M, et al. Modeling canopy conductance and transpiration from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019,268:189-201.
[28] Wang S, Ju W, Penuelas J, et al. Urban-rural gradients reveal joint control of elevated CO2 and temperature on extended photosynthetic seasons[J]. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2019,3:1076-1085.
pmid: 31235928 url: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235928
[29] Zhang Y, Commane R, Zhou S, et al. Light limitation regulates the response of autumn terrestrial carbon uptake to warming[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2020,10:739-743.
[30] Zhang Y, Parazoo N C, Williams A P, et al. Large and projected strengthening moisture limitation on end-of-season photosynjournal[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020,117(17):9216-9222.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914436117 pmid: 32284402 url: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32284402
[31] Yang P Q, van der Tol C. Linking canopy scattering of far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence with reflectance[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018,209:456-467.
[32] Zeng Y, Badgley G, Dechant B, et al. A practical approach for estimating the escape ratio of near-infrared solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019,232:111209.
[33] Zhang Z, Chen J M, Guanter L, et al. From canopy-leaving to total canopy far-red fluorescence emission for remote sensing of photosynjournal:First results from TROPOMI[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2019,46(21):12030-12040.
[34] Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Porcar-Castell A, et al. Reduction of structural impacts and distinction of photosynthetic pathways in a global estimation of GPP from space-borne solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020,240:111722.
[35] Liu X, Guanter L, Liu L, et al. Downscaling of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from canopy level to photosystem level using a random forest model[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019,231:110772.
[36] Liu X, Liu L, Hu J, et al. Improving the potential of red SIF for estimating GPP by downscaling from the canopy level to the photosystem level[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2020,281:107846.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107846 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168192319304629
[37] 李德仁, 李明. 无人机遥感系统的研究进展与应用前景[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2014,39(5):505-513,540.
[37] Li D R, Li M. Research advance and application prospect of unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing system[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014,39(5):505-513,540.
doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20140045 url: http://ch.whu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2977.shtml
[38] 廖小罕, 周成虎, 苏奋振, 等. 无人机遥感众创时代[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016,18(11):1439-1447.
[38] Liao X H, Zhou C H, Su F Z, et al. The mass innovation era of UAV remote sensing[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2016,18(11):1439-1447.
[39] 廖小罕, 肖青, 张颢. 无人机遥感:大众化与拓展应用发展趋势[J]. 遥感学报, 2019,23(6):1046-1052.
[39] Liao X H, Xiao Q, Zhang H. UAV remote sensing:Popularization and expand application development trend[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2019,23(6):1046-1052.
[40] 廖小罕. 地理科学发展与新技术应用[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020,39(5):709-715.
[40] Liao X H. Advance of geographic sciences and new technology applications[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(5):709-715.
[1] ZHANG Hongli, LUO Weiran, LI Yan. Spatiotemporal fusion of remote sensing images based on particle swarm optimization and pixel decomposition[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2020, 32(4): 33-40.
[2] JIN Xin, KE Chang-qing. Monitoring of Snow Cover Changes in Tianshan Mountains Based on Mixed Pixel Decomposition[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2012, 24(4): 146-151.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-2
Copyright © 2017 Remote Sensing for Natural Resources
Support by Beijing Magtech