Please wait a minute...
 
自然资源遥感  2022, Vol. 34 Issue (4): 1-10    DOI: 10.6046/zrzyyg.2021371
  综述 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
高光谱遥感图像大气校正研究进展
孔卓(), 杨海涛(), 郑逢杰, 李扬, 齐济, 朱沁雨, 杨忠霖
航天工程大学航天信息学院,北京 101416
Research advances in atmospheric correction of hyperspectral remote sensing images
KONG Zhuo(), YANG Haitao(), ZHENG Fengjie, LI Yang, QI Ji, ZHU Qinyu, YANG Zhonglin
School of Space Information, University of Space Engineering, Beijing 101416, China
全文: PDF(1376 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

大气校正是高光谱遥感图像预处理的重要步骤之一,大气校正的精度在一定程度上决定了高光谱遥感应用的程度。首先,分析了大气对辐射传输的影响,并对大气中气溶胶光学厚度和水汽的反演方法作了总结,说明了影响高光谱遥感图像质量的主要大气因素; 其次,通过阐明辐射传输方程的推导过程及相关参数的作用机理,从理论上对大气的影响进行了论证,说明了高光谱大气校正的主要内容; 然后,总结了近年来形成的高光谱大气校正方法,包括基于经验统计的方法和基于辐射传输的方法,并对高光谱大气校正的研究进展与发展趋势进行分析; 最后,对高光谱遥感图像大气校正的未来发展进行了展望,为高光谱遥感的工程应用与研究提供参考。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孔卓
杨海涛
郑逢杰
李扬
齐济
朱沁雨
杨忠霖
关键词 高光谱遥感大气校正辐射传输方程辐射传输模型人工神经网络    
Abstract

Atmospheric correction is an important preprocessing step for hyperspectral remote sensing images. The atmospheric correction quality determines the application degree of hyperspectral remote sensing to a certain extent. First, this study analyzed the influence of the atmosphere on radiative transfer and summarized the inversion methods of aerosol optical thickness and water vapor in the atmosphere, indicating the main atmospheric factors affecting the quality of hyperspectral remote sensing images. Then, the influence of the atmosphere was demonstrated theoretically by clarifying the derivation process of the radiative transfer equation and the action mechanism of relevant parameters, indicating the main aspects of hyperspectral atmospheric correction. Furthermore, this study summarized the hyperspectral atmospheric correction methods formed in recent years, including methods based on empirical statistics and radiative transfer, and analyzed the study advances and development trends of hyperspectral atmospheric correction. Finally, this study forecasted the development of atmospheric correction of hyperspectral remote sensing images. This study will provide a certain reference for the engineering application and study of hyperspectral remote sensing.

Key wordshyperspectral remote sensing    atmospheric correction    radiative transfer equation    radiative transfer model    artificial neural network
收稿日期: 2021-11-05      出版日期: 2022-12-27
ZTFLH:  TP79  
基金资助:基础加强计划重点基础研究项目(2020-JCJQ-ZD-152-12-04)
通讯作者: 杨海涛(1979-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事航天遥感等方面的研究。Email: yanghtt@126.com
作者简介: 孔 卓(1998-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事高光谱遥感方面的研究。Email: kz951525758@163.com
引用本文:   
孔卓, 杨海涛, 郑逢杰, 李扬, 齐济, 朱沁雨, 杨忠霖. 高光谱遥感图像大气校正研究进展[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2022, 34(4): 1-10.
KONG Zhuo, YANG Haitao, ZHENG Fengjie, LI Yang, QI Ji, ZHU Qinyu, YANG Zhonglin. Research advances in atmospheric correction of hyperspectral remote sensing images. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(4): 1-10.
链接本文:  
https://www.gtzyyg.com/CN/10.6046/zrzyyg.2021371      或      https://www.gtzyyg.com/CN/Y2022/V34/I4/1
时间 卫星 光谱成像仪 国家 轨道高度/km 光谱范围/μm 谱段数 光谱分辨率/nm 空间分辨率/m 幅宽/km
2000年 EO-1 Hyperion 美国 705 0.40~2.50 242 10 30 7.7
2001年 PROBA-1 CHRIS ESA 615 0.40~1.05 62 11 17/34 13
2008年 HJ-1A HSI 中国 649 0.45~1.05 115 5 100 50
2008年 IMS-1 HYSI 印度 0.40~0.95 64 10 506 129.5
2016年 Resurs-P3 GSA 俄罗斯 477 0.40~1.10 216 5~10 25~30 30
2018年 GF-5 AHSI 中国 705 0.45~2.50 330 5/10 30 60
2018年 ISS DESIS 德国 397 0.40~1.00 235 2.5 30
2019年 ZY-1-02D HSI 中国 778 0.40~2.50 166 10/20 30 60
2019年 HysIS HysIS 印度 636 0.40~2.50 326 10 30 30
2021年 GF-5-02 AHSI 中国 705 0.45~2.50 330 5/10 30 60
Tab.1  国内外部分星载高光谱成像仪技术指标
Fig.1  辐射传输过程示意图
Fig.2  不同大气分子成分对辐射传输的影响
模型 介绍
6S 6S是5S的改进版本,它将大气-地表系统耦合在大范围的大气、光谱和几何条件下,有效模拟了太阳辐射。采用连续散射阶算法,改善了散射效应的计算。并将大气进行分层,每层通过迭代辐射传输方程进行计算,可计算0.24~4.0 μm的地表反射率
MODTRAN MODTRAN是对LOWTRAN的改进模型,它几乎考虑了大气中所有大气分子、气溶胶及云的吸收和散射效应,并对分子吸收算法进行了改进,将光谱分辨率提高到了1 nm,可以计算波数为0.2 μm至无穷大的大气透射率和辐射。6S与MODTRAN是构成其他大部分辐射传输模型的基本模型,这2种模型模拟了辐射传输的物理机制,精度较高,但模拟不可能完全准确,且不能实现对光谱的打磨等后处理
ATREM ATREM是开发最早的高光谱大气辐射传输模型之一,它在Malkmus窄带模型推导大气透射光谱的基础上创建水汽查找表,并结合三波段比值法得到每个像元的水汽含量。采用6S代码模拟大气散射作用,最终结果是逐像元估计的水汽含量图及辐射校正图。目前已停止支持使用。ATREM由于没有考虑邻近效应的影响,因此在雾霾和高对比度杂波环境中不太准确
HATCH HATCH是在ATREM基础上的一种改进模型,主要改进包括采用k-相关方法从高分辨率透射分子吸收数据库(HITRAN)推导大气透射,使用了一个快速辐射传输方程求解器,并改进了水汽反演的三波段比值法,同时,它采用了光谱重校准方法,使得计算精度得到了提高。但与ATREM一样,HATCH同样没有考虑邻近效应的影响
ACORN ACORN移植了MODTRAN的代码,使用MODTRAN生成水汽查找表,然后根据高光谱数据进行最小二乘拟合。ACORN的一个关键改进是进行了全光谱拟合,以解决地表植被中水蒸气和液态水吸收重叠的问题。但ACORN在计算过程中同样没有考虑邻近效应
FLAASH FLAASH也是在MODTRAN基础上开发的辐射传输模型,它利用图像数据与大气特性,以物理方法精确推算地表反射率,并在计算过程中考虑了邻近效应的影响,同时能够校正倾斜观测导致的误差,计算精度得到了很大提升,目前已集成于ENVI软件中,已在高光谱遥感中得到了广泛的应用。但FLAASH计算结果中可能会出现负反射率,且不能进行有效改善
ATCOR ATCOR使用了MODTRAN的辐射传输代码和HITRAN数据库,能够很好地处理邻近效应,ATCOR3及之后版本可支持高光谱图像运算,在机载高光谱的大气校正中应用较为广泛,而在卫星遥感中适用于处理中小视场卫星图像
Tab.2  常见辐射传输模型
[1] 陶伟. 基于Hyperion高光谱数据的城市地物识别与分类研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2013.
Tao W. Urban feature identification and classification based on Hyperion hyperspectral remote sensing data[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2013.
[2] Sedaghat A, Mokhtarzade M, Ebadi H. Uniform robust scale-invariant feature matching for optical remote sensing images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(11):4516-4527.
doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2144607
[3] 赵英时. 遥感应用分析原理与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004:8-9,161-162.
Zhao Y S. The principle and method of analysis of remote sensing application[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004:8-9,161-162.
[4] 童庆禧, 张兵, 郑兰芬. 高光谱遥感——原理、技术与应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006:67-69.
Tong Q X, Zhang B, Zheng L F. Hyperspectral remote sensing[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006:67-69.
[5] Schaepman M E, Ustin S L, Plaza A J, et al. Earth system science related imaging spectroscopy:An assessment[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113(s1):123-137.
[6] 梅安新, 彭望琭, 秦其明, 等. 遥感导论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001:8-9.
Mei A X, Peng W L, Qin Q M, et al. Introduction to remote sensing[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2001:8-9.
[7] 周婷婷. 遥感影像辐射校正研究与应用[D]. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2010.
Zhou T T. Research and applications of remote sensing radiometric correction[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Normal University, 2010.
[8] Goetz A, Vane G, Solomon J E, et al. Imaging spectrometry for earth remote sensing[J]. Science, 1985, 228(4704):1147-1153.
pmid: 17735325
[9] Katse V I L, Prikhach A S, Zege E P, et al. A robust atmospheric correction procedure for determination of spectral reflectance of terrestrial surfaces from satellite spectral measurements[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(9):1831.
doi: 10.3390/rs13091831
[10] 王浩天, 汪源, 袁强强. 2008—2016年MODIS多角度大气校正气溶胶产品在中国的时空分布及变化趋势[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2021, 36(1):1-12.
Wang H T, Wang Y, Yuan Q Q. Validation and spatiotemporal analysis of MODIS multi-angle atmospheric calibration aerosol products in China from 2008 to 2016[J]. Remote Sensing Technolo-gy and Application, 2021, 36(1):1-12.
[11] 黄红莲, 提汝芳, 张冬英, 等. 高分五号卫星偏振遥感陆地上空气溶胶光学厚度[J]. 红外与毫米波学报, 2020, 39(4):454-461.
Huang H L, Ti R F, Zhang D Y, et al. Inversion of aerosol optical depth over land from directional polarimetric camera onboard Chinese Gaofen-5 satellite[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2020, 39(4):454-461.
[12] Levy R C, Remer L A, Mattoo S, et al. Second-generation operational algorithm:Retrieval of aerosol properties over land from inversion of moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer spectral reflectance[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2007, 112:D13211.
[13] Diner D J, Martonchik J V, Kahn R A, et al. Using angular and spectral shape similarity constraints to improve MISR aerosol and surface retrievals over land[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 94(2):155-171.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.09.009
[14] 王中挺, 厉青, 王桥, 等. 利用深蓝算法从HJ-1数据反演陆地气溶胶[J]. 遥感学报, 2012, 16(3):596-610.
Wang Z T, Li Q, Wang Q, et al. HJ-1 terrestrial aerosol data retrieval using deep blue algorithm[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2012, 16(3):596-610.
[15] Schlaepfer D, Borel C C, Keller J, et al. Atmospheric precorrected differential absorption technique to retrieve columnar water vapor[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998, 65(3):353-366.
doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00044-3
[16] Suomalainen J, Oliveira R A, Hakala T, et al. Direct reflectance transformation methodology for drone-based hyperspectral imaging[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 266:112691.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112691
[17] Schott J R. Remote sensing:The image chain approach[M]. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2007:42-56.
[18] 毛克彪, 覃志豪. 大气辐射传输模型及MODTRAN中透过率计算[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2004(4):1-3.
Mao K B, Qin Z H. The transmission model of atmospheric radiation and the computation of transmittance of MODTRAN[J]. Geomatics and Spatial Information Technology, 2004(4):1-3.
[19] Ran W A, Jagab C, Rm A, et al. Errors associated with atmospheric correction methods for airborne imaging spectroscopy: Implications for vegetation indices and plant traits[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 265:112663.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112663
[20] Kruse F A. Comparison of ATREM, ACORN, and FLAASH atmospheric corrections using low-altitude AVIRIS data of Boulder,CO[C]// Proceedings 13th JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop. Pasadena: JPL Publication, 2004.
[21] Pathak V N, Pandya M R, Shah D B, et al. Inter comparison of atmospheric correction models-SACRS2, FLAASH and 6SV using resourcesat-2 AWiFS data[C]// International Archives of the Photogrammetry,Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2014:881-884.
[22] 吴晓明. 地基Headwall高谱影像大气校正方法[J]. 空间科学学报, 2019, 39(4):537-543.
Wu X M. Atmospheric correction method for ground-based Headwall hyperspectral imagery[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2019, 39(4):537-543.
[23] 刘梓钦, 赵世湖, 裴亮, 等. GF-5卫星高光谱数据大气校正反射率精度评价[J]. 遥感信息, 2021, 36(3):93-98.
Liu Z Q, Zhao S H, Pei L, et al. Precision evaluation on atmospheric correction reflectance of GF-5 satellite hyperspectral data[J]. Remote Sensing Information, 2021, 36(3):93-98.
[24] Kruse F A. Use of airborne imaging spectrometer data to map minerals associated with hydrothermally altered rocks in the northern grapevine mountains,Nevada,and California[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1988, 24(1):31-51.
doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90004-1
[25] Roberts D A, Yamaguchi Y, Lyon R. Comparison of various techniques for calibration of AIS data[C]// Proceedings of 2nd AIS workshop, Pasadena: JPL Publication 86-35, 1986:21-30.
[26] Teillet P M, Fedosejevs G. On the dark target approach to atmospheric correction of remotely sensed data[J]. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 1995, 21(4):374-387.
doi: 10.1080/07038992.1995.10855161
[27] Hall F G, Strebel D E, Nickeson J E, et al. Radiometric rectification: Toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1991, 35(1):11-27.
doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90062-B
[28] Conel J E, Green R O, Vane G, et al. AIS-2 radiometry and a comparison of methods for the recovery of ground reflectance[C]// Proceedings of the 3rd, Airborne Imaging Spectrometer Data Analysis Workshop.Pasadena,CA:JPL Publication 87-30, 1987:18-47.
[29] Bernstein L S, Ratkowski A J. Validation of the quick atmospheric correction (QUAC) algorithm for VNIR-SWIR multi- and hyperspectral imagery[J]. Proceedings of Spie the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2005, 5806:668-678.
[30] Ientilucci E J, Adler-Golden S. Atmospheric compensation of hyperspectral data:An overview and review of in-scene and physics-based approaches[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2019, 7(2):31-50.
doi: 10.1109/MGRS.2019.2904706
[31] Sun J, Xu F, Cervone G, et al. Automatic atmospheric correction for shortwave hyperspectral remote sensing data using a time-dependent deep neural network[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2021, 174:117-131.
doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.02.007
[32] 赵祥, 梁顺林, 刘素红, 等. 高光谱遥感数据的改正暗目标大气校正方法研究[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2007(12):1653-1659.
Zhao X, Liang S L, Liu S H, et al. Correction of hyperspectral remote sensing data atmospheric correction method for dark targets[J]. Science in China(Series D), 2007(12):1653-1659.
[33] 郑求根, 权文婷. 基于暗像元的Hyperion高光谱影像大气校正[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2010, 30(10):2710-2713.
Zheng Q G, Quan W T. Application of dark pixels atmospheric correction algorithm to Hyperion imageries[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2010, 30(10):2710-2713.
[34] 伊丕源, 刘原麟, 武鼎, 等. 顾及时间因子的航空高光谱影像辐射归一化校正[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(20):8342-8349.
Yi P Y, Liu Y L, Wu D, et al. Impact analysis of time variation in atmospheric correction of airborne hyperspectral imagery[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(20):8342-8349.
[35] Wang C, Myint S W. A simplified empirical line method of radiometric calibration for small unmanned aircraft systems-based remote sensing[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2015, 8(5):1876-1885.
doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2422716
[36] 董连凤. 高光谱影像预处理技术研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2007.
Dong L F. Study on the hyperspectral image preprocessing[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2007.
[37] Hadjit H, Oukebdane A, Belbachir A H. Atmospheric correction of earth-observation remote sensing images by Monte Carlo method[J]. Journal of Earth System Science, 2013, 122(5):1219-1235.
doi: 10.1007/s12040-013-0337-4
[38] Kaufman Y J, Sendra C. Algorithm for automatic atmospheric corrections to visible and near-IR satellite imagery[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1988, 9(8):1357-1381.
doi: 10.1080/01431168808954942
[39] Xian G, Homer C. Updating the 2001 national land cover database impervious surface products to 2006 using Landsat imagery change detection methods[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114(8):1676-1686.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.018
[40] 郑伟, 曾志远. 遥感图像大气校正方法综述[J]. 遥感信息, 2004(4):66-70.
Zheng W, Zeng Z Y. A review on methods of atmospheric correction for remote sensing images[J]. Remote Sensing Information, 2004(4):66-70.
[41] Zoran M, Stefan S. Atmospheric and spectral corrections for estimating surface albedo from satellite data[J]. Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials, 2006, 8(1):247-251.
[42] Adler-Golden S M, Matthew M W, Bernstein L S, et al. Atmospheric correction for shortwave spectral imagery based on MODTRAN4[C]// Proceedings of SPIE. Denver: The International Society for Optical Engineering, 1999:61-69.
[43] Gao B C, Heidebrecht K B, Goetz A. Derivation of scaled surface reflectances from AVIRIS data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1993, 44(2-3):165-178.
doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(93)90014-O
[44] Zheng Q, Bruce C K, Alexander F H G. The high accuracy atmospheric correction for hyperspectral data (HATCH) model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(6):1223-1231.
doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2003.813125
[45] Craig J M. Performance assessment of ACORN atmospheric correction algorithm[C]// Proceedings of SPIE. Orlando: The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2002:438-449.
[46] Cooley T, Anderson G P, Felde G W, et al. FLAASH, a MODTRAN4-based atmospheric correction algorithm, its application and validation[C]// Proceeding of International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium(IGARSS).IEEE, 2002:1414-1418.
[47] Balthazar V, Vanacker V, Lambin E F. Evaluation and parameterization of ATCOR3 topographic correction method for forest cover mapping in mountain areas[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2012, 18:436-450.
[48] Santini F, Palombo A. Physically based approach for combined atmospheric and topographic corrections[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(10):1218.
doi: 10.3390/rs11101218
[49] 郭飞. 基于MODTRAN的高光谱快速大气校正方法[J]. 现代电子技术, 2015, 38(10):23-27.
Guo F. A fast hyperspectral atmospheric correction method based on MODTRAN[J]. Modern Electronics Technique, 2015, 38(10):23-27.
[50] 佃袁勇, 方圣辉, 徐永荣. 一种协同反演气溶胶与水汽含量的高光谱图像大气校正算法[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2015, 27(2):22-28.doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2015.02.04.
doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2015.02.04
Dian Y Y, Fang S H, Xu Y R. An atmospheric correction algorithm for hyperspectral imagery with collaborative retrieval of aerosol optical thickness and water vapor content[J]. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 2015, 27(2):22-28.doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2015.02.04.
doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2015.02.04
[51] 胡顺石, 张立福, 佘晓君, 等. 遥感影像大气校正通用查找表的设计与插值算法[J]. 遥感学报, 2014, 18(1):45-60.
Hu S S, Zhang L F, She X J, et al. Design and interpolation of ageneral look-up table for remote sensing image atmospheric correction[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2014, 18(1):45-60.
[52] Hsu N C, Jeong M J, Bettenhausen, et al. Enhanced deep blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2013, 118(16):9296-9315.
doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50712
[53] Lipponen A, Mielonen T, Pitknen M R A, et al. Bayesian dark target algorithm for MODIS AOD retrieval over land[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2018, 11(3):1-27.
doi: 10.5194/amt-11-1-2018
[54] Kuter S, Weber G W, Akyürek Z, et al. Inversion of top of atmospheric reflectance values by conic multivariate adaptive regression splines[J]. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 2015, 23(4):651-669.
doi: 10.1080/17415977.2014.933828
[55] Thompson D R, Vijay N, Green R O, et al. Optimal estimation for imaging spectrometer atmospheric correction[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 216:355-373.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.07.003
[56] Wei J, Yu X, Lee Z, et al. Improving low-quality satellite remote sensing reflectance at blue bands over coastal and inland waters[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, 250:112029.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112029
[57] Gossn J I, Frouin R, Dogliotti A I. Atmospheric correction of satellite optical imagery over the Río de la Plata highly turbid waters using a SWIR-based principal component decomposition technique[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(6):1050.
doi: 10.3390/rs13061050
[58] Schroeder T, Behnert I, Schaale M, et al. Atmospheric correction algorithm for MERIS above case-2 waters[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2007, 28(7/8):1469-1486.
doi: 10.1080/01431160600962574
[59] 刘安伟. 基于高光谱影像的大气参数反演和大气校正[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2016.
Liu A W. Atmospheric parameter inversion and atmospheric radiative correction based on hyperspectral image[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2016.
[60] Xu F, Cervone G, Franch G, et al. Multiple geometry atmospheric correction for image spectroscopy using deep learning[J]. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2020, 14(2):024518.
[61] Pyo J C, Duan H, Ligaray M, et al. An integrative remote sensing application of stacked autoencoder for atmospheric correction and cyanobacteria estimation using hyperspectral imagery[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(7):1073.
doi: 10.3390/rs12071073
[62] Vanonckelen S, Lhermitte S, Rompaey A V. The effect of atmospheric and topographic correction methods on land cover classification accuracy[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2013, 24(1):9-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2013.02.003
[63] Zhang H, Yuan Y, Xu Y, et al. Remote sensing method for detecting green tide using HJ-CCD top-of-atmosphere reflectance[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2021, 102:102371.
doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102371
[1] 郭晓萌, 方秀琴, 杨露露, 曹煜. 基于人工神经网络的西辽河流域根区土壤湿度估算[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2023, 35(2): 193-201.
[2] 王界, 王光辉, 刘宇, 齐建伟, 张涛. 基于PROSPECT-VISIR模型构建新植被水分指数[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2022, 34(2): 56-62.
[3] 王茜, 任广利. 高光谱遥感异常信息在阿尔金索拉克地区铜金矿找矿工作中的应用[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2022, 34(1): 277-285.
[4] 高文龙, 张圣微, 林汐, 雒萌, 任照怡. 煤矿开采中SOM的遥感估算和时空动态分析[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(4): 235-242.
[5] 姜亚楠, 张欣, 张春雷, 仲诚诚, 赵俊芳. 基于多尺度LBP特征融合的遥感图像分类[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(3): 36-44.
[6] 臧传凯, 沈芳, 杨正东. 基于无人机高光谱遥感的河湖水环境探测[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(3): 45-53.
[7] 胡新宇, 许章华, 陈文慧, 陈秋霞, 王琳, 刘辉, 刘智才. 基于PROBA/CHRIS影像的归一化阴影植被指数NSVI构建与应用效果[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2021, 33(2): 55-65.
[8] 何海英, 陈彩芬, 陈富龙, 唐攀攀. 张家口明长城景观廊道Sentinel-1影像SBAS形变监测示范研究[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2021, 33(1): 205-213.
[9] 谷艳春, 孟庆岩, 胡蝶, 周小成. 工业热异常环境效应分析[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2020, 32(4): 190-198.
[10] 孙珂. 融合超像元与峰值密度特征的遥感影像分类[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2020, 32(4): 41-45.
[11] 王瑞军, 张春雷, 孙永彬, 王诜, 董双发, 王永军, 闫柏琨. 高光谱在甘肃红山多金属找矿模型构建中的应用[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2020, 32(3): 222-231.
[12] 申振宇, 高小红, 汤敏. 高海拔复杂地形区SPOT6图像大气校正方法对比及精度验证[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2020, 32(1): 81-89.
[13] 程东亚, 李旭东. 大气校正前后山地流域NDVI变化特征对比[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2020, 32(1): 90-97.
[14] 陈玲, 陈理, 李伟, 刘建宇. 基于FLAASH模型的Worldview3大气校正[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2019, 31(4): 26-31.
[15] 张东辉, 赵英俊, 秦凯. 典型目标地面光谱信息系统设计与实现[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2018, 30(4): 206-211.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-2
版权所有 © 2015 《自然资源遥感》编辑部
地址:北京学院路31号中国国土资源航空物探遥感中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060291/62060292 E-mail:zrzyyg@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发