Wetland landscape evolution and its relation to human disturbance in Xiong’an New Area based on the moving window method

doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2019.02.20

Abstract
Figures/Tables
References
Related Articles
Metrics

Download: PDF(10750 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

Wetland, one of the most important ecosystems on Earth, is well known as belonging to three major ecosystems together with forest and ocean. In recent years, wetland ecosystems have been threatened by the impact of human activities and urban development. It is of great significance to carry out the study of the relationship between wetland landscape evolution and human disturbance and to protect the ecological environment of wetland in Xiong’an New Area. In this paper, the authors analyzed the wetland landscape evolution and the response to human disturbance in Xiong’an New Area based on the moving window landscape method by using the land use data from the late 1980s to 2015. Some conclusions have been reached: From the 1980s to 2015, wetland landscape changed in Xiong’an New Area. From the time series, the wetland area showed a decrease trend mainly and wetland fragmentation increased gradually. The patch shape became complicated and the degree of connection was reduced. From the spatial distribution pattern, after the year of 2000, the wetlands fragmentation gradually increased in the central and northeastern area, and the fragmentation from the core area of the central wetlands to the edge gradually increased. From the 1980s to 2015, human disturbances showed a decreased trend mainly. The human disturbance decreased in the central and southwestern area from the 1980s to 2000. From 2000 to 2015, the human disturbance increased and then slowed down, which indicated that the wetland had shifted to the low intensity and sustainable development under the implementation of wetland protection policies. The human disturbance of the surrounding areas was affected by the expansion of construction land. The human disturbance has a good correspondence with wetland distribution.

Keywords Xiong’an New Area; wetland human disturbance the moving window method

TP79

Issue Date: 23 May 2019

	Service

	E-mail this article
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

	Jinxia LYU
	Weiguo JIANG
	Wenjie WANG
	Yinghui LIU
	Yue DENG
	Xiaoya WANG

Cite this article:

Jinxia LYU,Weiguo JIANG,Wenjie WANG, et al. Wetland landscape evolution and its relation to human disturbance in Xiong’an New Area based on the moving window method[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2019, 31(2): 140-148.

URL:

https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/10.6046/gtzyyg.2019.02.20 OR https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/Y2019/V31/I2/140

Fig.1 Land use map of the Xiong’an New Area in 2015

类型	景观指数	公式	取值范围
斑块面积指数	NP	NP=N, 式中N为景观中斑块的总数	NP≥1,无上限
	PD	PD=N/A, 式中A为景观总面积,即100 hm²的斑块数	PD>0,无上限
	LPI	$LPI = max (a 1, …, a i, …, a n) / A$ , 式中a_i为景观中第i个斑块的面积,1≤i≤n	0<LPI≤100
边界形状指数	PAFRAC	$PAFRAC = 2 ln (P / k) / ln (A)$ , 式中: P为斑块的周长; k为常数,对于栅格景观而言,k=4	1≤PAFRAC≤2
香农多样性指数	SHDI	$SHDI = - ∑ i = 1 m [P i ln (P i)]$ , 式中: P_i为景观类型i所占面积的比例; m为景观中的斑块类型总数目	0<SHDI≤100
构型指数	AI	$AI=[\sum_{i=1}^{m}(\frac{g_{ii}}{{max}\mathop{}_{\to}^{g_{ii}}})P_{i}](100)$, 式中g_ii为相应景观类型的相似邻接斑块数量	0<AI≤100
构型指数	CONTAG	$CONTAG = 1 + ∑ i = 1 m ∑ k = 1 m (P i) g ik ∑ k = 1 m g ik ln (P i) g ik ∑ k = 1 m g ik 2 ln (m) (100)$ , 式中g_ik 为i类型斑块和k类型斑块毗邻的数目	0<CONTAG≤100

Tab.1 Landscape pattern indexes

Tab.2 Landscape type with respect to hemerpby index

Fig.2 Wetland types distribution in Xiong’an New Area

Fig.3 Wetland landscape indexes in Xiong’an New Area from 1980s to 2015

Fig.4 Spatial distribution of wetland landscape number of pathes in Xiong’an New Area

Fig.5 Spatial distribution of wetland landscape perimeter-area fractal dimension in Xiong’an New Area

Fig.6 Spatial distribution of wetland landscape shannon’s diversity index in Xiong’an New Area

Fig.7 Spatial distribution of wetland landscape contagion in Xiong’an New Area

Fig.8 Spatial distribution of wetland landscape degree of hemeroby in Xiong’an New Area

Fig.9 Changes of degree of hemeroby in Xiong’an New Area from 1980s to 2015

Fig.10 Changes of annual average rainfall and temperature in Xiong’an New Area from 1985 to 2015

Fig.11 Changes of human disturbance factors in Xiong’an New Area from 1985 to 2015

[1]	杜培军, 陈宇, 谭琨 . 湿地景观格局与生态安全遥感监测分析——以江苏滨海湿地为例[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2014,26(1):158-166.doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2014.01.27. doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2014.01.27
[1]	Du P J, Chen Y, Tan K . Monitoring and analyzing wetland landscape pattern change and ecological security using remote sensing images:A case study of Jiangsu coastal wetland[J]. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 2014,26(1):158-166.doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2014.01.27.
[2]	Jiang W G, Lyu J X, Wang C C , et al. Marsh wetland degradation risk assessment and change analysis:A case study in the Zoige Plateau,China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017,82:316-326. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.059 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470160X17304119
[3]	苗李莉, 蒋卫国, 王世东 , 等. 基于遥感和GIS的北京湿地生态服务功能评价与分区[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2013,25(3):102-108.doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2013.03.18. doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2013.03.18
[3]	Miao L L, Jiang W G, Wang S D , et al. Comprehensive assessments and zoning of ecological service functions for Beijing wetland based on RS and GIS[J]. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 2013,25(3):102-108.doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2013.03.18.
[4]	邬建国 . 景观生态学——格局、过程、尺度与等级(第二版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007.
[4]	Wu J G. Landscape Ecology:Pattern,Process,Scale and Hierarchy(2nd Edition)[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007.
[5]	李建国, 李贵宝, 崔慧敏 , 等. 白洋淀芦苇湿地退化及其保护研究[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2004,2(3):35-38.
[5]	Li J G, Li G B, Cui H M , et al. Degradation of reed wetland and protection in Baiyangdian[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science and Technology, 2004,2(3):35-38.
[6]	张敏, 宫兆宁, 赵文吉 . 近30年来白洋淀湿地演变驱动因子分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016,35(2):499-507.
[6]	Zhang M, Gong Z N, Zhao W J . Analysis of driving forces of Baiyangdian wetland evolution during 1984—2013[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016,35(2):499-507.
[7]	白军红, 房静思, 黄来斌 , 等. 白洋淀湖沼湿地系统景观格局演变及驱动力分析[J]. 地理研究, 2013,32(9):1634-1644.
[7]	Bai J H, Fang J S, Huang L B , et al. Landscape pattern evolution and its driving factors of Baiyangdian lake-marsh wetland system[J]. Geographical Research, 2013,32(9):1634-1644.
[8]	Abdullah S A, Nakagoshi N . Changes in landscape spatial pattern in the highly developing state of Selangor,peninsular Malaysia[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006,77(3):263-275. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.03.003 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169204605000538
[9]	时玉涛, 温海燕, 乔光建 . 人类活动对滦河口湿地生态环境影响分析[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2011,9(3):124-128.
[9]	Shi Y T, Wen H Y, Qiao G J . An analysis of impact of human activities on wetland ecological environment in Luanhe River estuary[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science and Technology, 2011,9(3):124-128.
[10]	陈爱莲, 朱博勤, 陈利顶 , 等. 双台河口湿地景观及生态干扰度的动态变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010,21(5):1120-1128. url: http://xueshu.baidu.com/s?wd=paperuri%3A%28ebb223c85a4458b5ddaa636e2127de63%29&filter=sc_long_sign&tn=SE_xueshusource_2kduw22v&sc_vurl=http%3A%2F%2Fd.wanfangdata.com.cn%2FPeriodical_yystxb201005006.aspx&ie=utf-8&sc_us=18093820580246643920
[10]	Chen A L, Zhu B Q, Chen L D , et al. Dynamic changes of landscape pattern and eco-disturbance degree in Shuangtai estuary wet land of Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010,21(5):1120-1128.
[11]	匡文慧, 杨天荣, 颜凤芹 . 河北雄安新区建设的区域地表本底特征与生态管控[J]. 地理学报, 2017,72(6):947-959.
[11]	Kuang W H, Yang T R, Yan F Q . Regional urban land-cover characteristics and ecological regulation during the construction of Xiong’an New District,Hebei Province,China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(6):947-959.
[12]	姜鲁光, 吕佩忆, 封志明 , 等. 雄安新区土地利用空间特征及起步区方案比选研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017,39(6):991-998.
[12]	Jiang L G, Lyu P Y, Feng Z M , et al. Land use patterns of the Xiong’an New Area and comparison among potential choices of start zone[J]. Resources Science, 2017,39(6):991-998.
[13]	周杨 . 基于RS和GIS的白洋淀自然保护区湿地生态系统健康评价[D]. 保定:河北大学, 2017.
[13]	Zhou Y . Assessment of the Ecological Health of Wetlands in Baiyangdian Nature Reserve by RS and GIS Techniques[D]. Baoding:Hebei University, 2017.
[14]	Liu J Y, Kuang W H, Zhang Z X , et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics,patterns,and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014,24(2):195-210. doi: 10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6 url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6
[15]	Ning J, Liu J Y, Kuang W H , et al. Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010—2015[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018,28(5):547-562. doi: 10.1007/s11442-018-1490-0
[16]	陆健健 . 中国滨海湿地的分类[J].环境导报, 1996 (1):1-2.
[16]	Lu J J . Classification of coastal wetlands of China[J].Environment Herald, 1996 (1):1-2.
[17]	McDonnell M J, Pickett S T A . Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients:An unexploited opportunity for ecology[J]. Ecology, 1990,71(4):1232-1237. doi: 10.2307/1938259 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.2307/1938259
[18]	刘琦, 刘世梁, 赵清贺 , 等. 基于移动窗口法的水电开发影响下景观格局梯度分析[J]. 山地学报, 2012,30(5):638-646.
[18]	Liu Q, Liu S L, Zhao Q H , et al. Gradient analysis of landscape pattern affected by hydroelectric station based on moving window method[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2012,30(5):638-646.
[19]	刘吉平, 董春月, 盛连喜 , 等. 1955~2010年小三江平原沼泽湿地景观格局变化及其对人为干扰的响应[J]. 地理科学, 2016,36(6):879-887. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.06.010
[19]	Liu J P, Dong C Y, Sheng L X , et al. Landscape pattern change of the marsh and its response to human disturbance in the Small Sanjiang Plain,1955—2010[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016,36(6):879-887.
[20]	孙永光, 赵冬至, 吴涛 , 等. 河口湿地人为干扰度时空动态及景观响应——以大洋河口为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(12):3645-3655. doi: 10.5846/stxb201112061865 url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_stxb201212001.aspx
[20]	Sun Y G, Zhao D Z, Wu T , et al. Temporal and spatial dynamic changes and landscape pattern response of Hemeroby in Dayang estuary of Liaoning Province,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(12):3645-3655.
[21]	肖翠, 解雪峰, 吴涛 , 等. 浙江西门岛湿地景观格局与人为干扰度动态变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(11):3255-3262. url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201411025
[21]	Xiao C, Xie X F, Wu T , et al. Dynamic changes of landscape pattern and hemeroby in Ximen Island wetland,Zhejiang Province,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014,25(11):3255-3262.

[1]	HE Chenlinqiu, CHENG Bo, CHEN Jinfen, ZHANG Xiaoping. Information extraction methods of coastal wetland based on GF-3 fully polarimetric SAR data[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(4): 105-110.
[2]	HU Suliyang, LI Hui, GU Yansheng, HUANG Xianyu, ZHANG Zhiqi, WANG Yingchun. An analysis of land use changes and driving forces of Dajiuhu wetland in Shennongjia based on high resolution remote sensing images: Constraints from the multi-source and long-term remote sensing information[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2021, 33(1): 221-230.
[3]	DING Yuxue, CHU Yu, XUE Guangyin. Using domestic satellite data to carry out wetland survey:Exemplified by Heilongjiang Province[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2017, 29(s1): 151-154.
[4]	WEI Benzan, FU Lihua, FAN Fang, ZHANG Ce, JIE Wenhui, DONG Shuangfa. Remote sensing monitoring of wetlands dynamics in the Manas River basin from 1998 to 2015[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2017, 29(s1): 90-94.
[5]	ZHAO Yuling. Remote sensing survey and proposal for protection of the shoreline and the mangrove wetland in Guangdong Province[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2017, 29(s1): 114-120.
[6]	WANG Yijun, ZHAO Jun, WEI Wei, HAN Liqin. Remote sensing investigation and analysis of wetland in Gansu section of Heihe River Basin in the past 14 years[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2017, 29(3): 111-117.
[7]	LI Ru, ZHU Boqin, TONG Xiaowei, YUE Yuemin, GAN Huayang, WAN Sida. Change analysis in Hainan Dongzhai Wetland Reserve based on remote sensing data obtained during 2002-2013[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2017, 29(3): 149-155.
[8]	ZHAO Yuling. Remote sensing dynamic monitoring of the shoreline and the mangrove wetland in the Lingdingyang Estuary in the past 40 years[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2017, 29(1): 136-142.
[9]	LIANG Jianping, MA Daxi, MAO Dehua, WANG Zongming. Remote sensing based estimation of Phragmites australis aboveground biomass in Shuangtai Estuary National Nature Reserve[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2016, 28(3): 60-66.
[10]	CHAI Ying, RUAN Renzong, CHAI Guowu, FU Qiaoni. Species identification of wetland vegetation based on spectral characteristics[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2016, 28(3): 86-90.
[11]	XING Yu. Spatial responses of wetland change to climate in 32 years in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2015, 27(3): 99-107.
[12]	ZHANG Louxiang, RUAN Renzong, XIA Shuang. Parameter analysis of image texture of wetland in the Hongze Lake[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2015, 27(1): 75-80.
[13]	YAN Tingting, BIAN Hongfeng, LIAO Guixiang, SHENG Lianxi, ZHANG Jishun, GAO Minghui. Research status of methods for mapping forested wetlands based on remote sensing[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2014, 26(2): 11-18.
[14]	DU Peijun, CHEN Yu, TAN Kun. The remote sensing monitoring of land use/cover change and land surface temperature responses over the coastal wetland in Jiangsu[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2014, 26(2): 112-120.
[15]	DU Peijun, CHEN Yu, TAN Kun. Monitoring and analyzing wetland landscape pattern change and ecological security using remote sensing images：A case study of Jiangsu coastal wetland[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2014, 26(1): 158-166.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed