Please wait a minute...
 
Remote Sensing for Land & Resources    2019, Vol. 31 Issue (3) : 140-147     DOI: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2019.03.18
|
Dynamic assessment of habitat quality in eastern Jilin Province based on HSI model
Qinglin MENG1, Mingyu LI1(), Chunying REN2, Zongming WANG2, Yanlin TIAN2
1. Department of Geography, College of Sciences, Yanbian University, Yanji 133002, China
2. Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China
Download: PDF(2892 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

The assessment of habitat quality has important implications for the biodiversity conservation. It can provide scientific basis for the restoration and protection of the ecological environment and the formulation of regional sustainable development policies. Taking the east of Jilin Province as the study area and based on Landsat TM/OLI images and digital elevation model (DEM) data in 2000 and 2015, the authors selected water situation, degree of disturbance, shelters, and food source as evaluation factors. In addition, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine the weight, thus establishing a habitat quality evaluation model and making a dynamic assessment of the habitat quality in the eastern part of Jilin Province. Moreover, the reasons for change were analyzed from the aspects of assessment factors, land cover changes, social economy, and climate change. The results show that the areas of the best and better habitat quality in 2000 accounted for 37.69% and 46.88% of the study area respectively. The areas of the best and better habitat quality in 2015 accounted for 41.20% and 44.66% of the study area respectively. From 2000 to 2015, the area of habitat quality that got better was 9 414.19 km 2, and the area of habitat quality got worse, being 5 627.5 km 2. Land cover change is one of the causes of habitat quality change, and the vigorous development of eco-tourism and returning farmland to forests in Jilin Province constitute the main driving forces for improving the quality of the habitats. The suitable climatic conditions provide a powerful guarantee for the long-term stability of the ecological environment in the eastern part of Jilin Province.

Keywords habitat quality      dynamic assessment      land cover change      climate change     
:  TP75  
Corresponding Authors: Mingyu LI     E-mail: leemy@ybu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 30 August 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Qinglin MENG
Mingyu LI
Chunying REN
Zongming WANG
Yanlin TIAN
Cite this article:   
Qinglin MENG,Mingyu LI,Chunying REN, et al. Dynamic assessment of habitat quality in eastern Jilin Province based on HSI model[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2019, 31(3): 140-147.
URL:  
https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/10.6046/gtzyyg.2019.03.18     OR     https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/Y2019/V31/I3/140
Fig.1  Geographic map of the research area
目标层 准则层 决策层 生境质量分级标准
影响因子 权重 影响因子 权重 最好 较好 一般 差
生境质量 水源状况 0.3 河流密度/(km/ km2) 0.35 [1.2,+∞) [0.8,1.2) [0.4,0.8) [0,0.4)
湖泊密度/(个/km2) 0.65 [1.8,+∞) [1.2,1.8) [0.6,1.2) [0,0.6)
干扰因子 0.2 道路密度/(km/ km2) 0.45 [0,0.3) [0.3,0.6) [0.6,0.8) [0.8,+∞)
居民点密度/(个/km2) 0.55 [0,0.9) [0.9,1.8) [1.8,2.7) [2.7,+∞)
遮蔽条件 0.2 土地覆被类型 0.75 林地、湿地 草地 耕地 建设用地、裸地
坡度/(°) 0.25 [0,23) [23,40) [40,60) [60,90)
食物来源 0.3 NDVI 1 [0.5,1) [0.3,0.5) [0.1,0.3) [-1,0.1)
Tab.1  Habitat quality evaluation factor weight and grading standard
Fig.2  Distribution of habitat quality assessment factors in 2000 and 2015
Fig.3  Spatial distribution of increasing scores of evaluation factors
Fig.4  Results of habitat quality assessment in study area
年份 差 一般 较好 最好
面积/km2 比例/% 面积/km2 比例/% 面积/km2 比例/% 面积/km2 比例/%
2000年 1 437.69 1.63 12 160.63 13.80 41 296.56 46.88 33 202.88 37.69
2015年 1 460.69 1.66 10 999.56 12.48 39 343.75 44.66 36 292.19 41.20
Tab.2  Habitat suitability area in 2000 and 2015
Fig.5  Change in habitat suitability from 2000 to 2015
评价因子 水源状况 干扰因子 遮蔽条件 食物来源
生境质量 0.204 1 -0.215 6 0.054 7 0.340 4
Tab.3  Evaluation factor correlation coefficient
Fig.6  Change trend of NDVI in the study area
土地覆被类型 2015年
林地 草地 耕地 湿地 建设用地 裸地 总计
2000年 林地 69 151.14 19.49 1 384.63 95.65 105.86 14.58 70 771.36
草地 90.66 168.76 46.99 0.86 5.40 0.18 312.85
耕地 1 541.50 6.26 11 977.39 112.45 229.61 0.61 13 867.82
湿地 137.15 0.36 215.08 1 208.66 16.99 1.80 1 580.04
建设用地 6.78 0.19 2.80 5.90 1 108.96 0.49 1 125.12
裸地 34.70 0.02 2.15 2.46 0.42 225.10 264.85
总计 71 001.93 195.09 13 689.05 1 425.98 1 367.25 242.76
Tab.4  Land-use status transition matrices from 2000 to 2015(km2)
地区 GDP/亿元 人口/万 旅游人数/万人次
2000年 2015年 2000年 2015年 2000年 2015年
通化市 158.1 1034.45 137.4 882.8 225.25 221.1
白山市 93.6 690.15 90.2 769.2 132.74 125.4
延边州 171.5 886.06 207.2 1595.7 218.57 213.6
Tab.5  Change of GDP, population and tourist population by cities in the east of Jilin Province
Fig.7  Temperature and precipitation changes of the study area
[1] 李营, 张峰, 杨海军 , 等. 生物多样性生态功能区生境质量变化遥感监测研究[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2016,41(2):46-48.
[1] Li Y, Zhang F, Yang H J , et al. On habitat quality change monitoring by remote sensing in eco- functional area of biological diversity[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2016,41(2):46-48.
[2] Raven P J, Holmes N T, Dawson F H , et al. River habitat quality:The physical character of rivers and streams in the UK and Isle of Man[J]. England:Environment Agency, 1998: 85.
[3] 阴琨, 李中宇, 赵然 , 等. 松花江流域水生态环境质量评价研究[J]. 中国环境监测, 2015,31(4):26-34.
[3] Yin K, Li Z Y, Zhao R , et al. Study on assessment of water ecosystem quality in Songhua River Basin[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2015,31(4):26-34.
[4] 赵志轩, 严登华, 耿雷华 , 等. 白洋淀东方大苇莺繁殖生境质量评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(5):1483-1490.
[4] Zhao Z X, Yan D H, Geng L H , et al. Nest habitat quality evaluation for the oriental great reed warbler(Acrocephalus orientalis) in Baiyangdian Wetland[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014,25(5):1483-1490.
[5] 王强, 袁兴中, 刘红 , 等. 基于河流生境调查的东河河流生境评价[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(6):1548-1558.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201210201458
[5] Wang Q, Yuan X Z, Liu H , et al. Stream habitat assessment of Dong River,China,using river habitat survey method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(6):1548-1558.
[6] 王建宏, 蒲玫 . 甘肃大熊猫生境质量评价[J]. 动物学杂志, 2016,51(4):509-516.
[6] Wang J H, Pu M . Habitat quality evaluation of Giant Panda(Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in Gansu[J]. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2016,51(4):509-516.
[7] 王志强, 陈志超, 郝成元 . 基于HSI模型的扎龙国家级自然保护区丹顶鹤繁殖生境适宜性评价[J]. 湿地科学, 2009,7(3):197-201.
[7] Wang Z Q, Chen Z C, Hao C Y . Breeding habitat suitability evaluation of red-crown crane in Zhalong National Nature Reserve by the method of habitat suitability index[J]. Wetland Science, 2009,7(3):197-201.
[8] Sherrouse B C, Semmens D J, Clement J M . An application of social values for ecosystem services(SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,36:68-79.
[9] 吴健生, 曹祺文, 石淑芹 , 等. 基于土地利用变化的京津冀生境质量时空演变[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015,26(11):3457-3466.
[9] Wu J S, Cao Q W, Shi S Q , et al. Spatio-temporal variability of habitat quality in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area based on land use change[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015,26(11):3457-3466.
[10] 白杨, 郑华, 庄长伟 , 等. 白洋淀流域生态系统服务评估及其调控[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(3):711-717.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201203270417 url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_stxb201303005.aspx
[10] Bai Y, Zheng H, Zhuang C W , et al. Ecosystem services valuation and its regulation in Baiyangdian Baisn:Based on InVEST model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(3):711-717.
[11] 金龙如, 孙克萍, 贺红士 , 等. 生境适宜度指数模型研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008,27(5):841-846.
doi:
[11] Jin L R, Sun K P, He H S , et al. Research advances in habitat suitability index model[ J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008,27(5):841-846.
[12] 吴炳方, 苑全治, 颜长珍 , 等. 21世纪前十年的中国土地覆盖变化[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014,34(4):723-731.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7410.2014.04.04 url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_dsjyj201404004.aspx
[12] Wu B F, Yuan Q Z, Yan C Z , et al. Land cover changes of China from 2000 to 2010[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2014,34(4):723-731.
[13] 孙健 . 基于面向对象分类土地利用分析[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2018,41(1):185-188,192.
[13] Sun J . Land use analysis based on object-oriented classification[J]. Geomatics and Spatial Information Technology, 2018,41(1):185-188,192.
[14] Lin Y P, Lin W C, Wang Y C , et al. Systematically designating conservation areas for protecting habitat quality and multiple ecosystem services[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2017,90:126-146.
[15] Dong Z Y, Wang Z M, Liu D W , et al. Assessment of habitat suitability for water birds in the West Songnen Plain,China,using remote sensing and GIS[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013,55:94-100.
[16] Bazzazi A A, Osanloo M, Karimi B . Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods:Application of modified VIKOR method[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,38(3):2550-2556.
[17] 胡冬雪, 唐立娜, 邱全毅 , 等. 海峡西岸经济区景观格局10年变化及驱动力[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(18):6138-6147.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201401180141
[17] Hu D X, Tang L N, Qiu Q Y , et al. Decadal temporal changes in landscapes and their driving forces for West-bank Economic Zone of Taiwan Straits[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(18):6138-6147.
[18] 吉林省旅游局.吉林省旅游业发展“十二五”规划[EB/OL].(2011-3)[ 2018- 1- 26]. .
url: http://www.doc88.com/p-6354173381481.html
[18] Jilin Provincial Tourism Bureau. The 12th Five-Year Plan for tourism development in Jilin Province[EB/OL].(2011-3)[ 2018- 1- 26]. .
url: http://www.doc88.com/p-63543381481.html
[19] 中华人民共和国生态环境部.吉林省自然保护区名录[EB/OL].( 2013- 9- 27)[2018-1-26]. .
url: http://www.zhb.gov.cn/stbh/zrbhq/qgzrbhqml/201605/t20160522_342701.shtml
[19] Ministry of Ecological Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Jilin Provincial nature reserve list[EB/OL].( 2013- 9- 27)[2018-1-26]. .
url: http://www.zhb.gov.cn/stbh/zrbhq/qgzrbhqml/201605/t20160522_342701.shtml
[20] 刘敏 . 吉林省天然林保护工程绩效分析及深入实施的对策研究[J].当代生态农业, 2010(3-4):58-61.
[20] Liu M . Analysis of the performance of natural forest conservation project in Jilin Province and the countermeasures for in-depth implementation[J].Contemporary Eco-Agriculture, 2010(3-4):58-61.
[21] 姚晨光 . 吉林省退耕还林成果经验浅析[J].当代生态农业, 2013(3-4):54-56.
[21] Yao C G . Experience of returning farmland to forest in Jilin Province[J].Contemporary Eco-Agriculture, 2013(3-4):54-56.
[22] 于德江, 宗盛伟, 杜海波 , 等. 吉林省东部森林地区气候变化分析[J]. 农业与技术, 2015,35(1):162-164,184.
[22] Yu D J, Zong S W, Du H B , et al. Analysis of climate change in the forest area in the eastern part of Jilin Province[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2015,35(1):162-164,184.
[1] JIN Chengming, YANG Xingwang, JING Haitao. A RS-based study on changes in fractional vegetation cover in North Shaanxi and their driving factors[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(4): 258-264.
[2] WEI Haohan, XU Renjie, YANG Qiang, ZHOU Quanping. Variation and effect analysis of the water level of the Taihu Lake based on multi-source satellite altimetry data[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(3): 130-137.
[3] PAN Meng, CAO Yungang. Present status and perspectives of remote sensing survey of glacial lakes in High Asia[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2021, 33(1): 1-8.
[4] WANG Jiaxin, SA Chula, MAO Kebiao, MENG Fanhao, LUO Min, WANG Mulan. Temporal and spatial variation of soil moisture in the Mongolian Plateau and its response to climate change[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2021, 33(1): 231-239.
[5] Hongxia LUO, Shengpei DAI, Maofen LI, Yuping LI, Qian ZHENG, Yingying HU. Relative roles of climate changes and human activities in vegetation variables in Hainan Island[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2020, 32(1): 154-161.
[6] Chao MA, Panli CAI. Spatio-temporal changes and driving factors of environmental and ecological index in Culai-Lianhua area[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2019, 31(4): 199-208.
[7] Bing YU, Jiyan WANG, Yong SU, Dongsheng XIAO, Fuzhen LIU. A pixel transform-based land cover change detection approach: A case study of Beijing City[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2018, 30(3): 60-67.
[8] Zhigang XU, Hongrui ZHENG, Chenxi DAI, Peng GAO, Peijun DU. Evaluation of land cover and ecological change of Yongding Hakka Tulou World Heritage Protection Area using remote sensing image[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2018, 30(1): 102-108.
[9] Jiaojiao DIAO, Xinye GONG, Mingshi LI. A comprehensive change detection method for updating land cover data base[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2018, 30(1): 157-165.
[10] Yuting ZHANG, Zhenfei ZHANG, Zhi ZHANG. Remote sensing study of vegetation coverage during the period 1992—2014 in Dananhu desert area, Xinjiang[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2018, 30(1): 187-195.
[11] YAN Qiang, LIAO Jingjuan, SHEN Guozhuang. Remote sensing analysis and simulation of change of Ulan Ul Lake in the past 40 years[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2014, 26(1): 152-157.
[12] HUANG Wei-dong, LIAO Jing-juan, SHEN Guo-zhuang. Lake Change in Past 40 Years in the Southern Nagqu District of Tibet and Analysis of Its Driving Forces[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2012, 24(3): 122-128.
[13] HAO Hui-mei, HAO Yong-li, TIAN Dang-sheng. Dynamic Evaluating Regional Land-cover Changes and Associated Ecosystem's Service Value Based on RS and GIS[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2011, 23(4): 115-120.
[14] LU Yun-Ge, LIU Xiao, ZHANG Zhen-De. An Analysis of Characteristics and Driving Forces of Land Desertification in Sanjiangyuan Region[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2010, 22(s1): 72-76.
[15] LI Zhen, HUANG Hai-Jun. Land Use and Land Cover Change of the Coastal Zone Around Jiaozhou Bay[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2010, 22(4): 71-76.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-2
Copyright © 2017 Remote Sensing for Natural Resources
Support by Beijing Magtech