A comparative study of water body classification of wetlands based on hyperspectral images from the ZY1-02D satellite: A case study of the Baiyangdian wetland
CHEN Min1(), PENG Shuan2,3, WANG Tao2, WU Xuefang2, LIU Runpu2, CHEN Yushuo2, FANG Yanru2, YANG Pingjian2()
1. Geological Publishing House, Beijing 100083, China 2. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China 3. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300073, China
Water bodies serve as one of the three major elements in maintaining wetlands. Their dynamic monitoring can effectively protect wetland ecosystems. Conventional methods for monitoring water bodies in wetlands employ field surveys or manual interpretation of remote sensing images, which are costly and inefficient, and inapplicable to continuous dynamic monitoring. In recent years, using methods like machine and deep learning to extract water body features from satellite remote sensing images has developed into an effective means for monitoring water bodies in wetlands. Based on the hyperspectral images from the ZY1-02D satellite, this study classified the water bodies in the Baiyangdian wetland using machine learning, convolutional and transformer neural networks. The accuracy and computational efficiency of water body classification under different spectral preprocessing methods and different image neighborhood sizes in training were compared to explore the optimal data preprocessing method and classification model for water bodies in wetlands. The results indicate that deep learning significantly outperformed machine learning in classification accuracy and computational efficiency. In particular, the spectral-spatial residual network (SSRN) model based on the convolutional neural network achieved the highest classification accuracy (OA: 99.09 %, Recall: 99.62 %, F1-score: 0.99) under conditions of all spectral bands and a 9×9 neighborhood size. Besides, despite a low signal-to-noise ratio, the atmospheric water vapor absorption band contained significant information, assisting in improving the classification accuracy of water bodies in the wetland during model training and prediction. The results of this study are expected to provide methodological support for the business operation of water body classification of wetlands.
陈民, 彭栓, 王涛, 吴雪芳, 刘润璞, 陈玉烁, 方艳茹, 阳平坚. 基于资源1号02D高光谱图像湿地水体分类方法对比——以白洋淀为例[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2025, 37(3): 133-141.
CHEN Min, PENG Shuan, WANG Tao, WU Xuefang, LIU Runpu, CHEN Yushuo, FANG Yanru, YANG Pingjian. A comparative study of water body classification of wetlands based on hyperspectral images from the ZY1-02D satellite: A case study of the Baiyangdian wetland. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2025, 37(3): 133-141.
Li D, Wu B S, Chen B W, et al. Review of water body information extraction based on satellite remote sensing[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2020, 60(2):147-161.
Zhu J F, Zhou Y, Wang S X, et al. Analysis of changes of Baiyangdian wetland from 1975 to 2018 based on remote sensing[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2019, 23(5):971-986.
Wei C, Fu B L, Qin J L. et al. Monitoring of spatial-temporal dynamic changes in water surface in marshes based on multi-temporal Sentinel-1A data[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(2):251-260.doi:10.6046/zrzyyg.2021205.
Elhamjan· A, Kong C C, Ma L G,et al. Research on the extraction of discrete water body in wetland based on medium-resolution image:Taking Altay Kekesu wetland in Xinjiang as an example[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(11):50-55.
Cui D Y, Wang S D, Zhang X J. A remote sensing-based study on change in land use and vegetation cover in Xiong’an New Area from 1991 to 2021[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023, 35(4):214-225.doi:10.6046/zizyyg.2022311.
Liang S, Gong Z N, Zhao W J, et al. Information extraction of Baiyangdian wetland based on multi-season sentinel-2 images[J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2021, 36(4):777-790.
[7]
Liu C, Tao R, Li W, et al. Joint classification of hyperspectral and multispectral images for mapping coastal wetlands[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2020,14:982-996.
Sun W W,, Ren K, Xiao C C, et al. Classification of coastal wetlands based on hyperspectral and multispectral fusion data of ZY-1-02D satellite[J]. Spacecraft Engineering, 2020, 29(6):162-168.
Department of ecological environment of Hebei Province. 2022 Report on the State of the Ecology and Environment in HeBei Province[R/OL]. (2022-05)[2023-11-06]. http://hbepb.hebei.gov.cn/res/hbhjt/upload/file/20230602/bd9d635a2555484786a9891052dbfa49.pdf.
[10]
资源一号02D卫星总体概况及影像产品[J]. 航天器工程, 2020, 29(6):3-14.
General situation and image products of ZY-1 02D satellite[J]. Spacecraft Engineering, 2020, 29(6):3-14.
Liu Y N, Sun D X, Liang J, et al. Overview of ZY-1-02D satellite AHSI on-orbit performance and stability[J]. Spacecraft Engineering, 2020, 29(6):93-97.
[12]
Hu W, Huang Y, Wei L, et al. Deep convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification[J]. Journal of Sensors, 2015, 2015(1):258619.
[13]
Mou L, Ghamisi P, Zhu X X. Deep recurrent neural networks for hyperspectral image classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(7):3639-3655.
[14]
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep residual learning for image re-cognition[C]// 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).Las Vegas,NV,USA.IEEE, 2016:770-778.
[15]
Ben HamidaA, Benoit A, Lambert P, et al. 3-D deep learning approach for remote sensing image classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(8):4420-4434.
[16]
Li Y, Zhang H, Shen Q. Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral imagery with 3D convolutional neural network[J]. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(1):67.
[17]
Zhong Z, Li J, Luo Z, et al. Spectral-spatial residual network for hyperspectral image classification:A 3-D deep learning framework[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(2):847-858.
[18]
Paoletti M E, Haut J M, Plaza J, et al. A new deep convolutional neural network for fast hyperspectral image classification[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2018,145:120-147.
[19]
Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, et al. An image is worth 16×16 words:Transformers for image recognition at scale[J/OL]. 2020(2020-10-22). https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929.
[20]
Zhong Z, Li Y, Ma L, et al. Spectral-spatial transformer network for hyperspectral image classification:A factorized architecture search framework[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022,60:1-15.