Please wait a minute...
 
Remote Sensing for Natural Resources    2024, Vol. 36 Issue (4) : 82-91     DOI: 10.6046/zrzyyg.2023171
|
An improved 3D Octave convolution-based method for hyperspectral image classification
ZHENG Zongsheng(), WANG Zhenghan(), WANG Zhenhua, LU Peng, GAO Meng, HUO Zhijun
Department of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
Download: PDF(5821 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Hyperspectral image data are characterized by high dimensionality, sparse data, and rich spatial and spectral information. In spatial-spectral joint classification models, convolution operations for hyperspectral images can lead to computational spatial redundancy when processing large regions of pixels of the same category. Furthermore, the 3D convolution fails to sufficiently extract the deep spatial texture features, and the serial attention mechanism cannot fully account for spatial-spectral correlations. This study proposed an improved 3D Octave convolution-based model for hyperspectral image classification. First, the input hyperspectral images were divided into high- and low-frequency feature maps using an improved 3D Octave convolution module to reduce spatial redundancy information and extract multi-scale spatial-spectral features. Concurrently, a cross-layer fusion strategy was introduced to enhance the extraction of shallow spatial texture features and spectral features. Subsequently, 2D convolution was used to extract deep spatial texture features and perform spectral feature fusion. Finally, a 3D attention mechanism was used to focus on and activate effective features through interactions across latitudes, thereby enhancing the performance and robustness of the network model. The results indicate that, due to the adequate extraction of effective spatial-spectral joint features, the overall accuracy (OA), Kappa coefficient, and average accuracy (AA) were 99.32%, 99.13%, and 99.15%, respectively in the case where the Indian Pines (IP) dataset accounted for 10% in the training set and were 99.61%, 99.44%, and 99.08%, respectively when the Pavia University (PU) dataset represented for 3% of the training set. Compared to five mainstream classification models, the proposed method exhibits higher classification accuracy.

Keywords spatial redundancy      3D Octave convolution      cross-layer fusion      multi-scale      3D attention mechanism     
ZTFLH:  TP79  
Issue Date: 23 December 2024
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Zongsheng ZHENG
Zhenghan WANG
Zhenhua WANG
Peng LU
Meng GAO
Zhijun HUO
Cite this article:   
Zongsheng ZHENG,Zhenghan WANG,Zhenhua WANG, et al. An improved 3D Octave convolution-based method for hyperspectral image classification[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2024, 36(4): 82-91.
URL:  
https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/10.6046/zrzyyg.2023171     OR     https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/Y2024/V36/I4/82
Fig.1  Channel shift operation schematic
Fig.2  Improved 3D-Oct convolutional null spectrum feature extraction module
Fig.3  Structure diagram of three-dimensional attention mechanism module
Fig.4  Network structure of the method in this paper
Fig.5  Pseudo-color map and label map of IP and PU datasets
Fig.6  Influence of the number of spectral channels on the accuracy
Fig.7  Effect of adjacent pixel block size on accuracy
类别 SVM 3D-CNN SSRN HybridSN DBDA 本文方法
1 0.00 94.40 88.10 93.18 100.00 100.00
2 65.10 89.22 97.57 98.71 98.75 99.33
3 84.27 93.85 97.83 97.38 99.73 100.00
4 100.00 93.75 96.35 99.01 98.60 100.00
5 95.08 97.97 97.25 99.30 99.52 99.24
6 90.45 97.93 99.07 97.90 99.84 94.60
7 100.00 92.86 100.00 96.00 95.83 99.89
8 93.71 94.81 99.54 100.00 100.00 100.00
9 0.00 66.67 75.01 80.95 94.74 100.00
10 79.78 90.16 97.61 97.74 97.28 97.92
11 48.36 96.40 95.82 97.81 97.69 99.01
12 66.54 92.55 97.14 98.27 99.60 98.51
13 95.71 91.92 100.00 99.45 96.86 97.87
14 88.00 99.39 98.69 99.56 99.30 99.04
15 72.63 96.18 95.47 96.90 98.85 98.96
16 99.56 91.76 92.59 88.76 88.17 97.60
OA 66.94 94.82 97.25 97.92 98.64 99.32
Kappa 61.20 94.10 96.85 97.76 98.43 99.13
AA 45.47 90.82 95.30 97.11 98.31 99.15
Tab.1  Classification results of different algorithms on IP dataset(%)
类别 SVM 3D-CNN SSRN HybridSN DBDA 本文方法
1 93.37 96.40 98.25 97.26 98.80 99.94
2 94.73 99.13 99.85 99.87 99.90 100.00
3 74.46 91.14 93.05 99.09 97.53 99.50
4 90.37 97.50 97.00 99.89 99.93 98.10
5 99.92 99.24 99.92 99.23 98.17 99.77
6 89.20 99.30 96.61 99.78 99.81 99.67
7 81.68 92.64 98.58 100.00 99.61 99.60
8 79.04 90.23 92.65 96.41 98.02 98.50
9 100.00 94.22 96.95 99.77 99.88 99.51
OA 91.85 97.41 98.75 99.08 99.37 99.61
Kappa 89.22 96.56 98.34 98.68 99.17 99.44
AA 89.77 95.44 97.60 97.87 98.53 99.08
Tab.2  Classification resultsof different algorithms on PU dataset(%)
Fig.8  Classification effect of different algorithms on IP dataset
Fig.9  Classification effect of different algorithms on PU dataset
分类方法 IP数据集 PU 数据集
OA Kappa AA OA Kappa AA
不使用注意
力模块
97.75 97.86 92.38 98.65 98.21 98.20
使用CBAM
模块
98.64 98.43 98.31 99.37 99.17 98.53
本文方法 99.32 99.13 99.15 99.61 99.44 99.08
Tab.3  Classification results using different attention mechanisms on the IP and PU datasets(%)
[1] 陈功伟, 赵思颖, 倪才英. 高光谱监测技术在重金属污染土壤上的应用[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2019, 36(4):560-566.
doi: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2019.04.016
[1] Chen G W, Zhao S Y, Ni C Y. Hyperspectral monitoring of soil contaminated by heavy metals[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 36(4):560-566.
doi: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2019.04.016
[2] 洪霞, 江洪, 余树全. 高光谱遥感在精准农业生产中的应用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(1):529-531,540.
[2] Hong X, Jiang H, Yu S Q. Application of hyper-spectral remote sensing in production of precision agriculture[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(1):529-531,540.
[3] Ma L, Crawford M M, Tian J. Local manifold learning-based k-nearest-neighbor for hyperspectral image classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(11):4099-4109.
[4] Delalieux S, Somers B, Haest B, et al. Heathland conservation status mapping through integration of hyperspectral mixture analysis and decision tree classifiers[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012, 126:222-231.
[5] Ding S, Chen L. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines and particle swarm optimization[C]// 2009 International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science.Wuhan,China.IEEE, 2009:1-5.
[6] Kang X, Xiang X, Li S, et al. PCA-based edge-preserving features for hyperspectral image classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(12):7140-7151.
[7] Wang J, Chang C I. Independent component analysis-based dimensionality reduction with applications in hyperspectral image analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(6):1586-1600.
[8] Bandos T V, Bruzzone L, Camps-Valls G. Classification of hyperspectral images with regularized linear discriminant analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2009, 47(3):862-873.
[9] Cui B, Cui J, Lu Y, et al. A sparse representation-based sample pseudo-labeling method for hyperspectral image classification[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(4):664.
[10] Cao X, Xu Z, Meng D. Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification via robust low-rank feature extraction and Markov random field[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(13):1565.
[11] Kang X, Li S, Benediktsson J A. Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification with edge-preserving filtering[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(5):2666-2677.
[12] Chen Y, Zhao X, Jia X. Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral data based on deep belief network[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2015, 8(6):2381-2392.
[13] Madani H, McIsaac K. Distance transform-based spectral-spatial feature vector for hyperspectral image classification with stacked autoencoder[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(9):1732.
[14] Zhao W, Du S. Spectral-spatial feature extraction for hyperspectral image classification:A dimension reduction and deep learning approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(8):4544-4554.
[15] Lee H, Eum S, Kwon H. Cross-domain CNN for hyperspectral image classification[C]// IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.Valencia,Spain.IEEE, 2018:3627-3630.
[16] Chen Y, Jiang H, Li C, et al. Deep feature extraction and classification of hyperspectral images based on convolutional neural networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(10):6232-6251.
[17] Zhong Z, Li J, Luo Z, et al. Spectral-spatial residual network for hyperspectral image classification:A 3-D deep learning framework[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(2):847-858.
[18] Roy S K, Krishna G, Dubey S R, et al. HybridSN:Exploring 3-D-2-D CNN feature hierarchy for hyperspectral image classification[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020, 17(2):277-281.
[19] Li R, Zheng S, Duan C, et al. Classification of hyperspectral image based on double-branch dual-attention mechanism network[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(3):582.
[20] Zhang C, Wang J, Yao K. Global random graph convolution network for hyperspectral image classification[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(12):2285.
[21] Mou L, Ghamisi P, Zhu X X. Deep recurrent neural networks for hyperspectral image classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(7):3639-3655.
[22] Chen Y, Fan H, Xu B, et al. Drop an octave:Reducing spatial redundancy in convolutional neural networks with octave convolution[C]// 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).Seoul,Korea (South).IEEE, 2019:3434-3443.
[23] Woo S, Park J, Lee J Y, et al. CBAM:convolutional block attention module[C]// European Conference on Computer Vision.Cham:Springer, 2018:3-19.
[1] CHEN Li, ZHANG Xian, LI Wei, LI Yu, CHEN Haomin. Hierarchical multi-scale segmentation-based information extraction and dynamic monitoring for the Tagaung Taung nickel deposit, Myanmar[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2024, 36(4): 55-61.
[2] GUO Penghao, QIU Jianlin, ZHAO Shunan. A pansharpening algorithm for remote sensing images based on high-frequency domain and multi-depth dilated network[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2024, 36(3): 146-153.
[3] LIU Xiaoliang, WANG Zhihua, XING Jianghe, ZHOU Rui, YANG Xiaomei, LIU Yueming, ZHANG Junyao, MENG Dan. Identifying and monitoring tailings ponds by integrating multi-source geographic data and high-resolution remote sensing images: A case study of Gejiu City, Yunnan Province[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2024, 36(1): 103-109.
[4] SU Tengfei. A unsupervised quality valuation method for multi-scale remote sensing image segmentation based on boundary information[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023, 35(1): 35-40.
[5] SHEN Jun’ao, MA Mengting, SONG Zhiyuan, LIU Tingzhou, ZHANG Wei. Water information extraction from high-resolution remote sensing images using the deep-learning based semantic segmentation model[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(4): 129-135.
[6] WU Linlin, LI Xiaoyan, MAO Dehua, WANG Zongming. Urban land use classification based on remote sensing and multi-source geographic data[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 127-134.
[7] WEN Yintang, WANG Tiezhu, WANG Shutao, Wang Guichuan, LIU Shiyu, CUI Kai. Automatic extraction of mosaic lines from high-resolution remote sensing images based on multi-scale segmentation[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(4): 64-71.
[8] YU Xinli, SONG Yan, YANG Miao, HUANG Lei, ZHANG Yanjie. Multi-model and multi-scale scene recognition of shipbuilding enterprises based on convolutional neural network with spatial constraints[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(4): 72-81.
[9] JIANG Yanan, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Chunlei, ZHONG Chengcheng, ZHAO Junfang. Classification of remote sensing images based on multi-scale feature fusion using local binary patterns[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(3): 36-44.
[10] LIU Wanjun, GAO Jiankang, QU Haicheng, JIANG Wentao. Ship detection based on multi-scale feature enhancement of remote sensing images[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(3): 97-106.
[11] Decai JIANG, Wenji LI, Jingmin LI, Zhaofeng BAI. Extraction of the forest fire region based on the span of ALOS PALSAR by object-oriented analysis[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2019, 31(4): 47-52.
[12] Yufeng LIU, Ying PAN, Hu LI. Study of crown information extraction of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanicabased on high-resolution satellite remote sensing data[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2019, 31(4): 112-119.
[13] Dechao ZHAI, Yanan FAN, Yanan ZHOU. Multi-scale segmentation of satellite imagery by edge-incorporated weighted aggregation[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2019, 31(3): 36-42.
[14] Ning MAO, Huiping LIU, Xiangping LIU, Yanghua ZHANG. Optimal scale selection for multi-scale segmentation based on RMNE method[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2019, 31(2): 10-16.
[15] Liuqing WU, Xiangyun HU. Automatic building detection of high-resolution remote sensing images based on multi-scale and multi-feature[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2019, 31(1): 71-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-2
Copyright © 2017 Remote Sensing for Natural Resources
Support by Beijing Magtech