Please wait a minute...
 
REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES    2010, Vol. 22 Issue (1) : 101-106     DOI: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2010.01.19
Technology Application |
The Change of Wetland in Hexi Corridor in the Past Thirty Years and a Tentative Discussion on Its Mechanism
 BAI Lei, JIANG Qi-Gang, LIU Wan-Song, CUI Han-Wen
College of Geoexploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
Download: PDF(963 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

 In this paper, the wetland in Hexi Corridor was dynamically monitored by remote sensing technology using four different

temporal remote sensing data. The results show that the area of the wetland was 14 132.38 km2 in 1973, 13 299.44 km2 in 1990, 12

519.88 km2 in 2000, and 12 312.38 km2 in 2006. In the past 30 years, the reduced area amounted to 1 820.00 km2, which occupied

12.88% of the total area, with the dynamic degree being -0.39%. Natural wetland has been reduced continuously at an accelerating

speed, with swamp reduced most significantly. Meanwhile, the area of man-made wetland has steadily increased, especially in

recent years. The number and density of wetland patches have increased, and the fragmentation degree now is higher than that in

the past. The diversity index and evenness index have increased continuously, the difference between the proportions of  various

wetlands have decreased, and the distribution wetlands tends to become uniform. Temperature, precipitation, uplift of the Tibetan

plateau and other natural factors seem to be the important causes for wetland change in Hexi Corridor. In addition, human

activities have undoubtedly aggravated such a tendency.

Keywords Basin      Remote Sensing      Structure      Uranium Metallization     
Issue Date: 22 March 2010
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHU Min-qiang
YU Da-gan
WU Ren-guei
ZHAO Ying-jun
Cite this article:   
ZHU Min-qiang,YU Da-gan,WU Ren-guei, et al. The Change of Wetland in Hexi Corridor in the Past Thirty Years and a Tentative Discussion on Its Mechanism[J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND & RESOURCES, 2010, 22(1): 101-106.
URL:  
https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/10.6046/gtzyyg.2010.01.19     OR     https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/Y2010/V22/I1/101
[1] LI Weiguang, HOU Meiting. A review of reconstruction methods for remote-sensing-based time series data of vegetation and some examples[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 1-9.
[2] DING Bo, LI Wei, HU Ke. Inversion of total suspended matter concentration in Maowei Sea and its estuary, Southwest China using contemporaneous optical data and GF SAR data[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 10-17.
[3] FANG Mengyang, LIU Xiaohuang, KONG Fanquan, LI Mingzhe, PEI Xiaolong. A method for creating annual land cover data based on Google Earth Engine: A case study of the Yellow River basin[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 135-141.
[4] GAO Qi, WANG Yuzhen, FENG Chunhui, MA Ziqiang, LIU Weiyang, PENG Jie, JI Yanzhen. Remote sensing inversion of desert soil moisture based on improved spectral indices[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 142-150.
[5] ZHANG Qinrui, ZHAO Liangjun, LIN Guojun, WAN Honglin. Ecological environment assessment of three-river confluence in Yibin City using improved remote sensing ecological index[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 230-237.
[6] HE Peng, TONG Liqiang, GUO Zhaocheng, TU Jienan, WANG Genhou. A study on hidden risks of glacial lake outburst floods based on relief amplitude: A case study of eastern Shishapangma[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 257-264.
[7] LIU Wen, WANG Meng, SONG Ban, YU Tianbin, HUANG Xichao, JIANG Yu, SUN Yujiang. Surveys and chain structure study of potential hazards of ice avalanches based on optical remote sensing technology: A case study of southeast Tibet[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 265-276.
[8] WANG Qian, REN Guangli. Application of hyperspectral remote sensing data-based anomaly extraction in copper-gold prospecting in the Solake area in the Altyn metallogenic belt, Xinjiang[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 277-285.
[9] LYU Pin, XIONG Liyuan, XU Zhengqiang, ZHOU Xuecheng. FME-based method for attribute consistency checking of vector data of mines obtained from remote sensing monitoring[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 293-298.
[10] ZHANG Daming, ZHANG Xueyong, LI Lu, LIU Huayong. Remote sensing image segmentation based on Parzen window density estimation of super-pixels[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 53-60.
[11] XUE Bai, WANG Yizhe, LIU Shuhan, YUE Mingyu, WANG Yiying, ZHAO Shihu. Change detection of high-resolution remote sensing images based on Siamese network[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 61-66.
[12] SONG Renbo, ZHU Yuxin, GUO Renjie, ZHAO Pengfei, ZHAO Kexin, ZHU Jie, CHEN Ying. A method for 3D modeling of urban buildings based on multi-source data integration[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 93-105.
[13] AI Lu, SUN Shuyi, LI Shuguang, MA Hongzhang. Research progress on the cooperative inversion of soil moisture using optical and SAR remote sensing[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(4): 10-18.
[14] LI Teya, SONG Yan, YU Xinli, ZHOU Yuanxiu. Monthly production estimation model for steel companies based on inversion of satellite thermal infrared temperature[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(4): 121-129.
[15] LIU Bailu, GUAN Lei. An improved method for thermal stress detection of coral bleaching in the South China Sea[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(4): 136-142.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-2
Copyright © 2017 Remote Sensing for Natural Resources
Support by Beijing Magtech