Please wait a minute...
 
Remote Sensing for Natural Resources    2023, Vol. 35 Issue (3) : 230-240     DOI: 10.6046/zrzyyg.2022181
|
Spatial heterogeneity of the correlation between water quality and land use in the Chenjiang River basin, Chenzhou City
ZHOU Shisong1(), TANG Yuqi1,2(), CHENG Yuxiang1, ZOU Bin1,2, FENG Huihui1,2
1. School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
2. Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring (Central South University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410083, China
Download: PDF(4928 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

This study investigated the spatial heterogeneity of the correlation between water quality and land use in the Chenjiang River basin of Chenzhou City using the water quality and high-resolution remote sensing data of the river basin in September 2021. Based on the division of river basin buffer zones by different types and scales, this study calculated land use components and their landscape configurations, such as the shape, size, and distribution of patches. Then, this study analyzed the spatial heterogeneity effect of regional land use on water quality through single-factor and multi-factor correlation analyses. The results are as follows: ① In the single-factor correlation analysis of spatial heterogeneity between water quality and land use, circular buffer zones showed higher universality than riparian buffer zones, which played a complementary role in analyzing the effect of built-up land occupation on water quality parameters. In the multi-factor correlation analysis of spatial heterogeneity, the land use presented generally higher interpretation rates for water quality parameters in riparian buffer zones than in circular buffer zones, with the maximum total interpretation rate of land use for water quality parameters in circular buffer zones occurring on a scale of a radius of 700 m. ② Different land use components had different effects on water quality. The proportions of cultivated land, grassland, forest land, and water areas correlated positively with water quality, while those of building land and bare land correlated negatively with water quality. Among them, cultivated land, grassland, and building land had the most significant effects on water quality. Land use planning should consider the influence of land use components and reasonably allocate the proportions of artificial and natural features. ③ Different landscape configurations had different effects on water quality. The landscape shape index (LSI) and the largest patch index (LPI), which reflect the shape and size of patches, had negative effects on water quality. Furthermore, the interspersion and juxtaposition index (IJI), which reflects the distribution of patches, correlated negatively with the ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) content in water bodies on a small scale. Land use planning should consider the rationality of landscape configurations. For example, it is necessary to control the sizes of dominant land patches in the buffer zones. This study identified the buffer zone size that influences water quality the most and the land use components and landscape configurations that can explain the water quality of the Chenjiang River the best. Therefore, this study provides a basis for selecting scientific control measures for the deterioration of water quality in the Chenjiang River, showing certain significance for water environment protection.
Keywords river basin water quality      land use      spatial heterogeneity analysis      Chenjiang River in Chenzhou City     
ZTFLH:  TP79  
Issue Date: 19 September 2023
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Shisong ZHOU
Yuqi TANG
Yuxiang CHENG
Bin ZOU
Huihui FENG
Cite this article:   
Shisong ZHOU,Yuqi TANG,Yuxiang CHENG, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of the correlation between water quality and land use in the Chenjiang River basin, Chenzhou City[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023, 35(3): 230-240.
URL:  
https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/10.6046/zrzyyg.2022181     OR     https://www.gtzyyg.com/EN/Y2023/V35/I3/230
Fig.1  Distribution of water sampling points in Chenjiang River basin, Chenzhou City
Fig.2  Analysis process of spatial heterogeneity of water quality and land use in watershed
项目/
分类		 I类
(源头水)		 II类(生
活饮用水)		 III类(渔
业用水)		 Ⅳ类(工
业用水)		 Ⅴ类(农
业用水)
TN ≤ 0.20 0.500 1.00 1.5 2.0
TP ≤ 0.01 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.2
NH3-N ≤ 0.15 0.500 1.00 1.5 2.0
COD ≤ 15.00 15.000 20.00 30.0 40.0
Tab.1  Standard of water quality classification(mg·L-1)
Fig.3  Spatial distribution of water quality parameters at sampling points in the watershed
Fig.4  Proportion of land use types at different spatial scales in the Chenjiang River basin
水质参数 缓冲区
类型		 缓冲区
尺度/m		 土地利用组分 土地利用景观配置
林地 建筑用地 裸地 水域 耕草地 LSI IJI LPI
TN 圆形缓冲区 100 0.64*
200 0.56*
300
500
700 0.56* -0.55*
1 000 -0.52* 0.61* -0.60* 0.55* 0.58*
1 500 -0.51* 0.60* -0.64* 0.66* 0.59*
河岸缓冲区 100 0.66*
200 0.65* -0.55* 0.64*
TP 圆形缓冲区 100 -0.51* 0.65*
200 -0.50* 0.70**
300
500
700
1 000 0.58* -0.55* 0.53* 0.51*
1 500 -0.56* 0.69** 0.55*
河岸缓冲区 100 0.68**
200 0.61* 0.61*
NH3-N 圆形缓冲区 100 -0.53* -0.53*
200 -0.63*
300 0.61* -0.54*
500
700
1 000 0.51*
1 500
河岸缓冲区 100 -0.67**
200 0.63* -0.56*
COD 圆形缓冲区 100 0.82** -0.73** 0.71**
200 0.79** -0.86** 0.52*
300 0.73** -0.84** 0.59*
500 0.67** -0.87**
700 0.67** -0.87** 0.58*
1 000 -0.53* 0.72** -0.84** 0.67** 0.71**
1 500 -0.57* 0.74** -0.83** 0.69** 0.56*
河岸缓冲区 100 0.84** -0.85** 0.67**
200 0.79** -0.88** 0.63*
Tab.2  Results of single factor correlation analysis between water quality parameters and land use
缓冲区
类型		 缓冲区
尺度/m		 土地利用组分 土地利用景观配置 总解释率
林地 建筑用地 裸地 水域 耕草地 LSI IJI LPI
圆形缓冲区 100 0.24* 0.39** 0.62*
200 0.25* 0.21* 0.27* 0.71**
300 0.23* 0.22* 0.24* 0.63*
500 0.24* 0.28* 0.69*
700 0.31* 0.36* 0.75**
1 000 0.37** 0.39** 0.31* 0.63*
1 500 0.36** 0.43** 0.25* 0.35* 0.28* 0.68*
河岸缓冲区 100 0.46** 0.31* 0.27* 0.76**
200 0.42** 0.37* 0.39** 0.75**
Tab.3  Multi-factor correlation analysis results of water quality and land use
Fig.5  Result ordering of RDA in Chenjiang River basin
[1] Franco E G. The global risks report 2020[J/OL]. World Economic Forum (2020-01-28)[2022-05-09]. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020.
url: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020
[2] HHC S. Landscape ecological approach to the relationships of land use patterns in watersheds to water quality characteristics[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009, 12(6):956-963.
[3] 吕志强, 庆旭瑶, 任玉芬, 等. 山地城市河流土地利用结构对水质的影响——以重庆市为例[J]. 湖泊科学, 2016, 28(2):319-327.
[3] Lyu Z Q, Qing X Y, Ren Y F, et al. Effects of land use pattern on water quality in mountainous city:A case study of Chongqing City[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2016, 28(2):319-327.
doi: 10.18307/2016.0211 url: http://www.jlakes.org/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?doi=10.18307/2016.0211
[4] 刘丽娟, 李小玉, 何兴元. 流域尺度上的景观格局与河流水质关系研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19):5460-5465.
[4] Liu L J, Li X Y, He X Y. Advances in the studying of the relationship between landscape pattern and river water quality at the watershed scale[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19):5460-5465.
[5] 王杰, 李鹏, 高海东, 等. 丹江上游土地利用/景观指数与水质关系初探[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(6):383-389.
[5] Wang J, Li P, Gao H D, et al. A preliminary study on the relationship between land use/landscape index and water quality in the upper reaches of Danjiang River[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(6):383-389.
[6] Mitchell M G E, Bennett E M, Gonzalez A. Linking landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provision:Current knowledge and research gaps[J]. Ecosystems, 2013, 16(5):894-908.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2 url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2
[7] 张以晖. 黄浦江河岸带土地利用变迁及其水质响应关系研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2015.
[7] Zhang Y H. Study on land use change and water quality response relationship in the bank zone of Huangpu River[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2015.
[8] 赵鹏, 夏北成, 秦建桥, 等. 流域景观格局与河流水质的多变量相关分析[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(8):2331-2341.
[8] Zhao P, Xia B C, Qin J Q, et al. Multivariate correlation analysis between watershed landscape pattern and river water quality[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(8):2331-2341.
doi: 10.5846/stxb url: http://www.ecologica.cn/
[9] 张志敏, 杜景龙, 陈德超, 等. 典型网状河网区域土地利用和景观格局特征对地表季节水质的影响——以江苏省溧阳市为例[J]. 湖泊科学, 2022, 34(5):1524-1539.
[9] Zhang Z M, Du J L, Cheng D C, et al. Effects of land use and landscape pattern characteristics on surface seasonal water quality in typical networked river networks:A case study of Liyang City,Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Lake Science, 2022, 34(5):1524-1539.
[10] Tu J. Spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality across an urbanization gradient explored by geographically weighted regression[J]. Applied Geography, 2011, 31(1):376-392.
doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.001 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0143622810000846
[11] 李艳利, 徐宗学, 李艳粉. 浑太河流域多尺度土地利用/景观格局与水质响应关系初步分析[J]. 地球与环境, 2012, 40(4):573-583.
[11] Li Y L, Xu Z X, Li Y F. A preliminary analysis of the relationship between multi-scale land use/landscape pattern and water quality response in Huntai River basin[J]. Earth and Environment, 2012, 40(4):573-583.
[12] 陆君, 刘亚风, 黄洪辉, 等. 黄山市太平湖流域土地利用结构与河流水质相关性分析[J]. 复旦学报(自然科学版), 2014, 53(6):731-736,746.
[12] Lu J, Liu Y F, Huang H H, et al. Correlation analysis between land use structure and river water quality in Taiping Lake basin,Huangshan City[J]. Fudan Journal (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 53(6):731-736,746.
[13] 焦胜, 杨娜, 彭楷, 等. 沩水流域土地景观格局对河流水质的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(12):2263-2274.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201412005
[13] Jiao S, Yang N, Peng K, et al. Effects of land landscape pattern on river water quality in Shuishui basin[J]. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(12):2263-2274.
[14] Li S, Xia X, Tan X, et al. Effects of catchment and riparian landscape setting on water chemistry and seasonal evolution of water quality in the upper Han River basin,China[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(1):e53163.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053163 url: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053163
[15] 汪昱昆, 程锐辉, 曾鹏, 等. 上海地区河网水质空间分异及对河岸带土地利用的响应[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(7):925-932.
[15] Wang Y K, Cheng R H, Zeng P, et al. Spatial differentiation of water quality in river network in Shanghai and its response to land use in the riparian zone[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Enviroment, 2019, 35(7):925-932.
[16] 蔡宏, 何政伟, 安艳玲, 等. 基于遥感和GIS的赤水河水质对流域土地利用的响应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(2):286-291.
[16] Cai H, He Z W, An Y L, et al. Response of Chishui River water quality to land use in the basin based on remote sensing and GIS[J]. Resources and Environment of Yangtze River Basin, 2015, 24(2):286-291.
[17] 黄金良, 李青生, 洪华生, 等. 九龙江流域土地利用/景观格局-水质的初步关联分析[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(1):64-72.
[17] Huang J L, Li Q S, Hong H S, et al. Preliminary correlation analysis of land use/landscape pattern-water quality in Jiulongjiang River basin[J]. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(1):64-72.
[18] 罗贞礼, 黄璜. “红三角”地区之郴州市的可持续发展评价研究——生态足迹法[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2004(2):33-37.
[18] Luo Z L, Huang H. Research on sustainable development evaluation of Chenzhou City in the Red Triangle area:Ecological footprint method[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2004(2):33-37.
[19] 朱岗辉, 孙璐, 廖晓勇, 等. 郴州工业场地重金属和PAHs复合污染特征及风险评价[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(5):831-839.
[19] Zhu G H, Sun L, Liao X Y, et al. Characteristics and risk assessment of heavy metal and PAHs composite pollution in industrial site in Chenzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(5):831-839.
[20] 徐洪霞. 湖南省郴州市苏仙区矿区重金属污染综合治理措施研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014.
[20] Xu H X. Study on comprehensive treatment measures for heavy metal pollution in mining area of Suxian District,Chenzhou City,Hunan Province[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2014.
[21] 蒲泽生, 黄军, 李平学. 为了郴州新世纪的明天[J]. 城乡建设, 2002(5):17.
[21] Pu Z S, Huang J, Li P X. For the tomorrow of Chenzhou’s new century[J]. Urban and Rural Construction, 2002(5):17.
[22] 徐庆利, 兰国华. 郴州市主要河流水质评价和保护对策[J]. 绿色科技, 2015(5):184-186.
[22] Xu Q L, Lan G H. Water quality evaluation and protection countermeasures of major rivers in Chenzhou City[J]. Green Science and Technology, 2015(5):184-186.
[23] 陈百明, 周小萍. 《土地利用现状分类》国家标准的解读[J]. 自然资源学报, 2007(6):994-1003.
[23] Chen B M, Zhou X P. Interpretation of the national standard for classification of land use status[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007(6):994-1003.
[24] 国家环境保护总局. GB 3838—2002地表水环境质量标准[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2002.
[24] State Environmental Protection Administration. GB 3838—2002 surface water environmental quality standard[S]. Beijing: China Standards Publishing House, 2002.
[25] 黄玉瑶. 内陆水域污染生态学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.
[25] Huang Y Y. Pollution ecology of inland waters[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2001.
[26] Ding J, Jiang Y, Liu Q, et al. Influences of the land use pattern on water quality in low-order streams of the Dongjiang River basin,China:A multi-scale analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,551-552:205-216.
[27] Li S Y, Gu S, Tan X, et al. Water quality in the upper Han River basin,China:The impacts of land use/land cover in riparian buffer zone[J]. Hazard Mater, 2009(165):317-324.
[28] Maa D, Db B, Kh C, et al. The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems:An empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 80(4):345-361.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.08.001 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169204606001277
[29] 董小俊. 南方红壤丘陵区森林景观格局分析和优化研究[D]. 北京: 首都师范大学, 2014.
[29] Dong X J. Analysis and optimization of forest landscape pattern in red soil hilly area of southern China[D]. Beijing: Capital Normal University, 2014.
[30] 方娜, 刘玲玲, 游清徽, 等. 不同尺度土地利用方式对鄱阳湖湿地水质的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(12):5348-5357.
[30] Fang N, Liu L L, You Q H, et al. Effects of different scales of land use patterns on water quality in Poyang Lake wetlands[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(12):5348-5357.
[31] 朱红兵, 何丽娟. 关于用SPSS中单样本K-S检验法进行正态分布等的一致性检验时适用条件的研究[J]. 首都体育学院学报, 2009, 21(4):466-470.
[31] Zhu H B, He L J. Study on the applicable conditions for the consistency test of normal distribution and the like by single-sample K-S test in SPSS[J]. Journal of Capital University of Physical Education, 2009, 21(4):466-470.
[32] 焦欢. 渠溪河流域土地利用及格局对河流水质影响研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆工商大学, 2016.
[32] Jiao H. Study on the impact of land use and pattern on river water quality in Quxi River basin[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Technology and Business University, 2016.
[33] 周俊菊, 向鹃, 王兰英, 等. 祁连山东部冰沟河流域景观格局与河流水化学特征关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(12):3779-3788.
[33] Zhou J J, Xiang J, Wang L Y, et al. Relationship between landscape pattern and river water chemistry characteristics of Binggou River basin in the eastern Qilian Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecolo-gy, 2019, 38(12):3779-3788.
[34] 胡琳, 李思悦. 不同空间尺度土地利用结构与景观格局对龙川江流域水质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(7):1470-1481.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.07.016
[34] Hu L, Li S Y. Effects of land use structure and landscape patterns at different spatial scales on water quality in Longchuan River basin[J]. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(7):1470-1481.
[35] Guo Q H, Ma K M, Yang L, et al. Testing a dynamic complex hypothesis in the analysis of land use impact on lake water quality[J]. Water Resources Management, 2010, 24(7):1313-1332.
doi: 10.1007/s11269-009-9498-y url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-009-9498-y
[36] Xu Q, Wang P, Shu W, et al. Influence of landscape structures on river water quality at multiple spatial scales:A case study of the Yuan River watershed,China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 121:107226.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107226 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470160X20311651
[37] 吉冬青, 文雅, 魏建兵, 等. 流溪河流域景观空间特征与河流水质的关联分析[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(2):246-253.
[37] Ji D Q, Wen Y, Wei J B, et al. Correlation analysis between landscape spatial characteristics and river water quality in Liuxi River basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(2):246-253.
[38] Song M, Jiang Y, Liu Q, et al. Catchment versus riparian buffers:Which land use spatial scales have the greatest ability to explain water quality changes in a typical temperate watershed?[J]. Water, 2021, 13(13):1758.
doi: 10.3390/w13131758 url: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/13/1758
[1] YANG Yujin, YANG Fan, XU Zhenni, LI Zhu. Analysis and optimization of the spatio-temporal coordination between the ecological services and economic development in the Dongting Lake area[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023, 35(3): 190-200.
[2] LIANG Jintao, CHEN Chao, ZHANG Zili, LIU Zhisong. A random forest-based method integrating indices and principal components for classifying remote sensing images[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023, 35(3): 35-42.
[3] XIONG Dongyang, ZHANG Lin, LI Guoqing. MaxEnt-based multi-class classification of land use in remote sensing image interpretation[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023, 35(2): 140-148.
[4] WANG Haiwen, JIA Junqing, LI Beichen, DONG Yongping, HA Sier. Assessing intensive urban land use based on remote sensing images and industry survey data[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023, 35(2): 149-156.
[5] HUA Yongchun, CHEN Jiahao, SUN Xiaotian, PEI Zhiyong. Analysis of landscape ecology risk of the Yellow River basin in Inner Mongolia[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023, 35(2): 220-229.
[6] LIU Chunlin, XIA Jianxin. Dynamic simulation of land use based on the LSTM-CA model[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(4): 122-128.
[7] YANG Lianwei, ZHAO Juan, ZHU Jiatian, LIU Lei, ZHANG Ping. Spatial-temporal change and prediction of carbon stock in the ecosystem of Xi’an based on PLUS and InVEST models[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(4): 175-182.
[8] SHI Shushu, DOU Yinyin, CHEN Yongqiang, KUANG Wenhui. Remote sensing monitoring based analysis of the spatio-temporal changing characteristics of regional urban expansion and urban land cover in China’s coastal zones[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(4): 76-86.
[9] WU Linlin, LI Xiaoyan, MAO Dehua, WANG Zongming. Urban land use classification based on remote sensing and multi-source geographic data[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 127-134.
[10] SONG Qi, FENG Chunhui, MA Ziqiang, WANG Nan, JI Wenjun, PENG Jie. Simulation of land use change in oasis of arid areas based on Landsat images from 1990 to 2019[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(1): 198-209.
[11] WU Jiang, LIU Chun, YING Shen, YU Ting. Spatial delineation methods of urban areas[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(4): 89-97.
[12] SANG Xiao, ZHANG Chengye, LI Jun, ZHU Shoujie, XING Jianghe, WANG Jinyang, WANG Xingjuan, LI Jiayao, YANG Ying. Application of intensity analysis theory in the land use change in Yijin Holo Banner under the background of coal mining[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(3): 148-155.
[13] XIAO Dongsheng, LIAN Hong. Population spatialization based on geographically weighted regression model considering spatial stability of parameters[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(3): 164-172.
[14] DENG Xiaojin, JING Changqing, GUO Wenzhang, Yan Yujiang, CHEN Chen. Surface albedos of different land use types in the Junggar Basin[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(3): 173-183.
[15] WANG Qingchuan, XI Yantao, LIU Xinran, ZHOU Wen, XU Xinran. Spatial-temporal response of ecological service value to land use change: A case study of Xuzhou City[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(3): 219-228.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-2
Copyright © 2017 Remote Sensing for Natural Resources
Support by Beijing Magtech